Exhibit Layouts

Exhibit Layouts

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

Last week, in our lab and in the small layout room next door, we were juggling specimens for two Earth History Gallery exhibits. We are developing a timeline that will lead the visitor from the formation of the Earth (4.5 billion years ago) right up to the Ordovician Period of our Ancient Seas exhibit (about 450 million years ago). This timeline will feature quite a number of unusual geological specimens and reconstructions, each of which will be placed in a little case. So there was a group meeting of the people involved: the designer, collections staff, conservators, and me. We contemplated each specimen, as I lifted them in turn to show how they should be oriented and placed. In the course of an hour or so, we contemplated a piece of the oldest rock in the world, a banded iron formed on an early seafloor, some beautiful Cambrian sponges, and many other pieces. I can hardly wait to see these installed in the exhibit, but that is still a couple of months off.  We are continuing to work together on the “look” of the exhibit; more of that in my next post.

Photo looking down to a desk where some one's hands are in frame writing notes in paper with specimens placed along the top.

Specimens for the Cambrian exhibit are laid out on a lab table together with a draft design of exhibit copy (those hands belong to conservator Lisa May).

Four images of varying specimens, some on shelves, some held in the photographer's hand.

As exhibits are planned, specimens are photographed as they will be oriented on mounts. Then the conservators and technical staff get to work to produce the beautiful permanent supports. These are some of the Precambrian rocks and fossils that will be placed in the timeline exhibit.

Meanwhile, the final specimens for our Ancient Seas exhibit were being “staged,” along with their mounts, prior to being moved downstairs for final installation in the Earth History Gallery. The main part of this exhibit was opened early in the spring, but some of the specimen installation and lighting were delayed until now because mount-making and light installation are very laborious tasks and cannot be rushed.

At the end of last week and start of this week, we placed specimens into special “windows” that had been cut into the boxes of the Ancient Seas info rail, so that the visitors will be able to see at least one fossil for every kind of creature depicted in the video animation. As the job is complicated, we were only able to install a couple of specimens each day.

Close-up on a fossilized jellyfish.

This splendid Ordovician jellyfish from central Manitoba was inserted into a case in the Ancient Seas interpretive rail a couple of days ago.

Close-up on an illustration of a group of jellyfish swimming in blue water in the Ancient Seas exhibit of the Manitoba Museum.

The animated jellyfish in Ancient Seas are based on the fossil jellies from central Manitoba.

The Manitoba Museum Ancient Seas exhibit, a large curving screen along a wall showing animation of a view of a tropical sea with the silhouettes of two individuals engaging in the exhibit.

Under the guiding eye of designer Stephanie Whitehouse, technical wizards Bert Valentin and Wayne Switek sorted out the complicated fibre optic lighting and mounts, then they worked with conservator Lisa May to place each specimen in exactly the right position. I came in toward the end of each installation to serve as quality control on the placement and lighting (or as chief pain, perhaps), then each case was closed up and ready for the public. The exhibit is now absolutely, finally, 100% complete, and it is gorgeous!

 

Image: The Ancient Seas exhibit, in a photo from earlier this year. This week, we finished installing the final specimens in cases in the rail in front of the video.

A Typical (or is that atypical?) Day

As I sit at my desk being stared at by a stuffed turtle surrounded by sand dollars, Australian mice, gut contents of a snake, Indo-Pacific fishes, a set of lizard dentaries, and a donation form for a frozen hermit thrush and yellow rail, it occurred to me that many of the typical tasks of curators would be considered atypical, if not downright bizarre, for anyone not working in a natural history museum.

For example, I just got off the phone with someone who was thinking about donating a taxidermied wolf. We frequently receive offers of wolf and bear rugs, various African animal skins, skulls and bones, along with window-killed birds. Before we accept any one of these interesting and generous offers, I need to determine if it meets the mandate of the Museum, is in good condition with quality data, has been legally obtained, fills a gap in our collections or might meet an exhibit need, as well as take into consideration storage issues (is there enough space, do we have the resources to maintain the item properly over the long term).

Earlier today, I took a baby rabbit out of the freezer that was such a donation last year. It needs to thaw so that a university student volunteer can make a study skin to add to the collection. The student is gaining a museum skill and learning mammal anatomy, experience useful in her pursuit of a science career studying mammals; the Museum gets some specimen preparation gratis.

A variety of specimens on a desk top amongst various paperwork.

Among the desk clutter: Australian mice, Indo-Pacific fishes, a stuffed turtle, sand dollars, a vial of snake gut contents, and a donation form for a yellow rail and hermit thrush.

A variety of birds and small mammals pinned out on a light pink board along with some paperwork identifying the specimens.

A series of study skins of birds and mammals prepared by volunteers pinned out on a foam board. The cottontail is on the bottom right.

Another phone call comes in: how long do monarch butterflies stay in the chrysalis before hatching? [About two weeks.]

Everyone gets e-mail. But one of mine involves obtaining an old Marsh Wren nest from Oak Hammock Marsh to replace one in an exhibit that was damaged. They know of some nests, when can I come out and pick it up? Another e-mail is from a colleague at The Natural History Museum in London dealing with the visit of my PhD student to his molecular lab where she was extracting DNA of a genus of goby found on coral reefs throughout the Indo-Pacific.

Two stacks of small clear plastic containers with blue lids. The top to lids are ajar, showing toad specimens inside each.

In the wet lab here, I just changed the fluid for a series of toads I collected in the Interlake during the spring. The switch from formalin (a nasty fixative) to 70% alcohol will ensure their long-term preservation and make them easier to use for anatomical studies examining the northern hybrid zone between American and Canadian toads. Next up is preparing specimens of Hudson Bay brachiopods for a loan to an eastern Canadian researcher looking at chemical composition and climate change.

Now to get back to correcting the page-proofs so I can get that  paper on colour variation in garter snakes published… or maybe I should review the new text panels for the snake den exhibit.

So, what did you do today?

 

Image: A series of toads collected in the Interlake last spring being prepared for addition to the permanent collections.

Dr. Randy Mooi

Dr. Randy Mooi

Curator of Zoology

Dr. Mooi received his Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Toronto working on the evolutionary history of coral reef fishes. Following a postdoctoral fellowship in the Division of Fishes of the Smithsonian Institution…
Meet Dr. Randy Mooi

The Day the Birds Took Over the Beach

I was out on Victoria Beach after Labour Day looking for more bugseeds and it was like a scene from an Alfred Hitchcock movie or episode of that documentary “Life After People”.

When I visited Victoria Beach before it was full of families and buff teenagers laying on brightly coloured towels or cavorting happily in the water. Now the only signs of any human presence at all were the occasional empty pop cans, discarded sandals, and cast off fluorescent pool noodles. It was like humanity had vanished off the face of the earth and I was destined to live out my final days as the last member of our species. The gulls were sitting quietly on the rocks by the shore, masters of all they surveyed. They looked rather smug, presumably with satisfaction that the human squatters were finally gone, leaving them in peace once more. Or perhaps I was just imagining it.

A small group of sea gulls perched on and flying around some rocks sticking out of the lake.

Gulls and shorebirds were the only denizens of Victoria Beach on September 8th.

Empty shoreline of a lake with rocks scattered about the sand and dense trees on the edge of the sand.

A deserted Victoria Beach.

Later in the week while out at an equally deserted Grand Beach I was puzzled to find an odd animal track in the sand that I had never seen before: tiny little footprints and a pronounced tail mark. The tracks looked fresh so I figured that if I just did a bit more investigating I’d find the culprit. I was eventually overjoyed to find a tiny baby snapping turtle, only about 8 cm long from head to tail tip. He/she was probably only a few weeks old and heading to the lake to find a nice muddy spot to bury him/herself in for the winter. I’m sure that the journey from the marsh to the lake was easier without hundreds of sunbathers to crawl around or harass it.

The absence of people made my task a lot easier as well as I could hike through the dunes without being fearful of barging in on any scantily clad young couples hoping for a few moments of privacy. I set out early in the morning to hike along shore and see if I could find some bugseeds in the sand dunes. Fortunately, it didn’t take long. I had just reached the beach and was bending over to tie my shoe when voila there it was on the eroding bank right next to the stairway. If only all my field work could be that easy! Anyway I spent the rest of the day walking along the beach to determine how widespread the species was. So this trip resulted in the rediscovery of two populations of bugseeds in the area and two new records of bugseeds at Traverse Bay and Grand Beach. Now it’s back to the laboratory to prepare my plant collection for processing and try to make some sense out of my field notes.

A small turtle crawling along the sand leaving behind foot prints and tail tracks.

This baby snapping turtle was only 8 cm long.

View of wooden steps coming up from the beach shoreline.

Where I found some American Bugseed.

I’m sure the birds were happy to see me go.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Bagging Bugseeds

For the last several weeks I’ve been climbing over sand dunes, hiking over hills and sauntering along beaches in pursuit of bugseeds. What are bugseeds you may wonder? They are a group of annual plants that grow in sandy habitats. Up until fairly recently, they were thought to be weeds introduced to North America from Europe. Recent research revealed that they are in fact native to the Americas. After studying herbarium specimens from all over Canada, I realized that some of the species may be rare. Since most specimens of bugseed were collected 40 to 100 years ago, I decided to try to relocate the old populations to determine if the populations had disappeared or were still present.

Close-up on a small green plant growing out of sand.

A rare Hooker’s Bugseed plant.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson wearing a rain jacket, wide-brimmed hat, and backpack standings at a wooden railing looking out over a treed landscape.

Standing on the lookout platform at Spruce Woods Provincial Park.

My first few days of field work were spent north of Glenboro in Spruce Woods Provincial Park and Canadian Forces Base Shilo. American bugseed was locally common at Shilo due to it’s tolerance and even preference for, areas with some disturbance. I found it on sandy roads, cutaways into sandy hills, bladed trails, and old sand pits as well as on sand dunes and natural blowouts. Hooker’s bugseed, on the other hand, was found in only one spot in the whole province: firm wind-swept dune blowouts in Spruce Woods Provincial Park. Hairy bugseed was also found on natural dune blowouts in the park and at Shilo. At several sites, particularly along railroads, the bugseeds appear to have been extirpated, their likely habitat taken over by exotic weeds like Russian thistle and Lamb’s quarters.

A striped chipmunk on a fallen log.

This little guy posed nicely for my camera.

A white frilly fungus growing on wood.

A lovely Branched Hericium fungus I found.

A lumpy prickly cactus growing among grasses.

A huge pincushion cactus I saw.

One of the things I love about doing field work is the opportunity to see interesting plants and animals while I’m searching for rare plants. I saw a tiny little chipmunk on a fallen spruce tree, very kindly posing for the camera for me. In a little bluff of trees I was thrilled to finally encounter a specimen of Branched Hericium (Hericium ramosum) growing on a rotting log. I’ve been looking for that species for years. I was also astounded to find the largest pincushion cactus (Coryphantha vivipara) that I’ve ever seen (about 25 cm high and 60 cm in diameter). So despite the windy weather that whipped sand in my face and made me feel like I could become airborne, it was an interesting and successful week.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Gear

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

Last week, in the lab next to my office, we finished sorting and putting away the remainder of the gear from this summer’s field expedition. As you might expect, there were hammers, chisels, and field bags, the basic necessities for collecting fossils from hard limestone bedrock. But in addition to these, we washed multiple pry bars, shovels, geo-tools (mattocks), knee pads, and gloves. We sorted tool boxes, whisk brooms, insect repellent, bug jackets, camera equipment, permanent markers, pencils, tarpaulins, metal tags, wires, nails, coolers, and thermoses, and filed away long-life food items to await our next field season.

Two individuals with a variety of packs and bins of gear on the sidewalk next to a Jeep with an open back hatch.

Outside the Museum door, Debbie Thompson (R) and I are contemplating how to fit gear into a Jeep as we prepare for 2010 fieldwork in the Grand Rapids Uplands. (photo © David Rudkin, Royal Ontario Museum)

Tightly packed and bound gear in the back of a floatplane. Bins and bags are tied to the left side with some ropes.

The field gear jams one side of an Otter floatplane, on the way to our camp at McBeth Point, Lake Winnipeg (August, 2006).

I often hear from people outside the “business” that it must be a lot of fun to do paleontological fieldwork. Of course it is, but many of those people probably don’t realize that a collecting trip carried out any distance from the Museum can be a very complex operation, one that may require almost military planning. When I started this sort of work, I certainly didn’t realize that I would have to become a “master of gear”. Depending on the type of fieldwork, we have had to become familiar with items as disparate as a firefighter’s backpack sprayer, a laser levelling survey device, and a Zodiac boat.

I am always fortunate that other people (Ed Dobrzanski in particular) take on a lot of the hard work of assembling field gear, but as I am often the leader of the field party, it is up to me to ensure that we have the requisite tools, food, and transportation. And woe betide me if I forget some of the more “subtle” essentials such as toilet paper!

Three tents set up on a grassy space near water near a dock.

Our tents are set up on the shore at McBeth Point in summer, 2006.

An individual wearing a brimmed hat and a red and black lifejacket steering the motor of a boat on a lake.

Sean Robson pilots the Museum’s Zodiac on the broad waters of Lake Winnipeg’s north basin.

Of course, all of the gear experience can have its practical advantages. I feel that I have nearly expert knowledge when it comes to selecting cold chisels or hammers. I know which types of tents are likely to stand up to heavy winds (and, more importantly, which ones aren’t!). I know how to enter and exit a helicopter or a float plane, and can shoot a cracker pistol to ward off bears. I can assemble a Zodiac boat from a few packages of unlikely looking parts. Not without bruising and bleeding, occasionally, but at least I am capable of practical and potentially useful tasks that may seem unlikely for someone in an academic discipline.

Pile of gear and a boat motor stacked on the dock of a lake.

A float plane on the water near a dock, on which there's a pile gear and a boat motor.

A mound of gear on the dock at McBeth Point awaits the arrival of a turbo Otter (below) for the return trip to civilization. As it turned out, winds prevented the Otter from tying to the dock, and we had to carry the hundreds of kilos of gear all the way around the harbour and load from the float!

Lily St. Storage Move

Collections and Conservation staff are busy dealing with a problem in our Lily St. storage location. A water pipe broke in the washrooms in the basement, putting water on the floor in several areas where collections are stored. Because the building is not going to be repaired (it’s slated for demolition sometime soonish) our landlords, Manitoba Centennial Centre Corporation (MCCC) want us to clear out the basement and close access to that level permanently. We were planning to pack everything up anyway for the move to a new (as yet unidentified) offsite collections storage location, but this acceleration of our schedule is a challenge.

The water has been shop-vacced up and fans are running 24/7, but the inevitable high humidity has unfortunately spawned some mould and corrosion on artifacts. We are isolating affected items and they will be cleaned before we wrap and pack them. Curators have been confirming all items that must be removed, including equipment and supplies. Collections go out first, though. Because we don’t have a new storage building yet, the bulk of artifacts will go just a short trip up to the main floor, where we are monitoring the humidity.

Human safety is the highest priority, so we’re donning lab coats, nitrile gloves, and dust masks (N95, against dusts and mists) as we work.

Not quite a crisis, but certainly a challenging project to complete ASAP. And it keeps raining; although sunny skies are predicted for the next few days. Stay tuned for a happy ending – I hope.

Goodbye Mars Hoax… for another year, anyway

Yet another August has brought yet another rendition of the Great Mars Hoax. A viral email telling people Mars would be as big as the Moon on August 27 derailed several days of work while I answered hordes of public inquiries about what would be seen. (Short answer: nothing.)

Don’t get me wrong, I love answering questions from the public. It’s a chance to interact one-on-one with people interested in science and astronomy, genuinely curious about the night sky. Unfortunately, in this case I had to tell people that what they read on the internet just wasn’t true. A lot of people were disappointed in the answer, and in the sky in general.

Like any good hoax, this one grew around a nugget of truth. On August 27, 2003 (note the year!), Mars did pass about as close to Earth as it could get. We were out at Bird’s Hill Park for several public telescope nights back in 2003, and we had something over 10,000 people turn up to see the Red Planet. To the unaided eye, it looked like a really bright, reddish-coloured star – nowhere near as big as the moon, though. In fact, about 75 times smaller than the moon.

But somewhere, some astronomer with bad writing skills issued a press release or made a statement that went something like this: “On August 27, if you put a 75x eyepiece in your telescope, then you’ll see Mars appear about as big as the moon does to the unaided eye.” What should have been written was something like this: “On August 27 *2003*, if you put a 75x eyepiece in your telescope, Mars will appear *through your telescope* about as big as the Moon does *to the unaided eye*. ”

Those missing details were then helped along by some malicious person who added pictures of a total lunar eclipse (when the moon turns red), and the undated email now appears every year. It wasn’t true in 2003, and it’s not true now. In fact, it can never be true, since Mars can never get close enough to Earth to appear that big. I mean, the moon is only 374,000km away, and Mars is only about twice as big as the moon is. That means Mars would have to be less than 800,000 km away to appear that big. If Mars somehow broke out of its orbit and was moving closer to Earth, you can bet it would be *the* news item. Even if somehow all the astronomers in the world, professional and amateur, were involved in one of those giant government conspiracies that are always invoked to explain stupid things, we’d STILL find out about it. The tides would be affected, both in timing and size, so you’d have to get all the fishermen and sailors and everyone who lives near the ocean in on the conspiracy as well.

OK, enough ranting. The Mars Hoax does have a silver lining, though – I got to talk with a whole bunch of people who might not have called in otherwise, and I got to tell them where Mars really was in the sky – and Venus and Jupiter as well. Those folks got to see three planets in the sky that they might not have seen otherwise. For some of them, their personal universe got a little bigger because of it.

You can find out where the planets are – for real – on our “The Sky This Month” blog on the Manitoba Museum website. Visit

Yet another August has brought yet another rendition of the Great Mars Hoax. A viral email telling people Mars would be as big as the Moon on August 27th derailed several days of work while I answered hordes of  public inquiries about what would be seen. (Short answer: nothing.)

Don’t get me wrong, I love answering questions from the public. It’s a chance to interact one-on-one with people interested in science and astronomy, genuinely curious about the night sky. Unfortunately, in this case I had to tell people that what they read on the internet just wasn’t true. A lot of people were disappointed in the answer, and in the sky in general.

Like any good hoax, this one grew around a nugget of truth. On August 27th, 2003 (note the year!), Mars did pass about as close to Earth as it could get. We were out at Bird’s Hill Park for several public telescope nights back in 2003, and we had something over 10,000 people turn up to see the Red Planet. To the unaided eye, it looked like a really bright, reddish-coloured star – nowhere near as big as the moon, though. In fact, about 75 times smaller than the moon.

But somewhere, some astronomer with bad writing skills issued a press release or made a statement that went something like this: “On August 27th, if you put a 75x eyepiece in your telescope, then you’ll see Mars appear about as big as the moon does to the unaided eye.” What should have been written was something like this: “On August 27th *2003*, if you put a 75x eyepiece in your telescope, Mars will appear *through your telescope* about as big as the Moon does *to the unaided eye*. ”

Those missing details were then helped along by some malicious person who added pictures of a total lunar eclipse (when the moon turns red), and the undated email now appears every year. It wasn’t true in 2003, and it’s not true now. In fact, it can never be true, since Mars can never get close enough to Earth to appear that big. I mean, the moon is only 374,000km away, and Mars is only about twice as big as the moon is. That means Mars would have to be less than 800,000 km away to appear that big. If Mars somehow broke out of its orbit and was moving closer to Earth, you can bet it would be *the* news item. Even if somehow all the astronomers in the world, professional and amateur, were involved in one of those giant government conspiracies that are always invoked to explain stupid things, we’d STILL find out about it. The tides would be affected, both in timing and size, so you’d have to get all the fishermen and sailors and everyone who lives near the ocean in on the conspiracy as well.

OK, enough ranting. The Mars Hoax does have a silver lining, though – I got to talk with a whole bunch of people who might not have called in otherwise, and I got to tell them where Mars really was in the sky – and Venus and Jupiter as well. Those folks got to see three planets in the sky that they might not have seen otherwise. For some of them, their personal universe got a little bigger because of it.

You can find out where the planets are – for real – on our “The Sky This Month” section of the Planetarium’s website. Visit the Planetarium webpage here – there you’ll find all sorts of information on the sky, telescopes, and of course our shows and programs. Or you can always call me.

Scott Young

Scott Young

Planetarium Astronomer

Scott is the Planetarium Astronomer at the Manitoba Museum, developing astronomy and science programs. He has been an informal science educator for thirty years, working in the planetarium and science centre field both at The Manitoba Museum and also at the Alice G. Wallace Planetarium in Fitchburg, Massachusetts. Scott is an active amateur astronomer and a past-President of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.

A Perfectly Miserable Field Day

I wrote a blog back in June about perfect field days. Today should have been one of the worst field days of my life. Hiking in the middle of an old gravel pit in 32°C heat (41°C humidex), with no clouds, virtually no wind, while sweating profusely is NOT a recipe for a perfect field day; more like a recipe for heat stroke! My day was salvaged however by making several interesting scientific discoveries. First of all I found a rare plant that I’d been looking for in that old gravel pit I was hiking in, namely American Bugseed. This species had not been collected in Birds Hill since 1929 so finding a population of about 800 plants was a good find.

A small green-yellow plant growing in sandy ground.

American Bugseed.

A close up on a cluster of yellow Goldenrod flowers on a yellow background.

Rigid Goldenrod.

My second high point was observing two species of insect (a bee fly and a bumblebee) visiting some of the common plants (Rigid Goldenrod and Hairy Golden Aster) in the park. The whole reason I was out at Birds Hill Park this week was because I needed some hard evidence (e.g. specimens and observations) to support my research hypothesis. I hypothesized that the rare Western Silvery Aster plant shares pollinators with common plants that bloom just before Western Silvery Aster does; the observation that I made today supports this statement. Essentially this means that the common plants in the park facilitate the persistence of Western Silvery Aster via their joint pollinators. The information I collected will be extremely useful in the development of my plant-insect interaction matrix for Manitoba’s tall-grass prairie, which will aid in conservation and restoration plans for this ecosystem.

Although I was way too hot to be excited about my findings at the time (I was too busy looking forward to getting back into the air-conditioned car) they helped to salvage what should have been a completely miserable field day.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Summer…Holidays?

“I will be unavailable until…” has been a frequent message when my number has been dialed over the last two months. And although a couple of days might have been vacation, the majority is explained by time spent on fieldwork, hence the lack of blogging. So what is “fieldwork”? For Museum curators, it means getting out of the office to collect information relevant to our collections or research projects. In zoology, this usually means to be out standing in the field – or sometimes forest, stream, or pond.

As wonderful as it is to be out of the city, away from phones and e-mail, and in a remote part of the province searching for fishes, frogs, toads, and snakes, fieldwork is challenging for all these same reasons. In the city, we have more-or-less regular hours, a family to come home to, and our needs and wants are only a phone call (or mouse-click) away. On remote islands, dirt tracks, or wading muskeg north of 60, you better have all you need in your backpack.

A man wearing hip-waders thigh-deep in a body of water near low-growing reeds and rushes.

Outstanding in the field – or is that out standing in a pond?

A man sitting with piles of luggage and packed boxes and bucks on a sandy beach.

Wonder if we brought enough food if the plane doesn’t show up?

A truck blurred as it drives by across the frame in blue-ish morning low-light.
And you don’t do fieldwork because the hours are good. For frogs and toads, daylight hours are used to scout out potential habitat and to look for eggs and tadpoles. But to find the adults in any numbers, you need to return to these sites when it is dark and males are serenading for lady friends. Up north in June, when the mosquitoes are hungry, many frogs and toads don’t begin calling consistently until about 11 pm! It can make for a long day (and night).

Regardless, we’re crazy enough to enjoy it – the thrill of the chase and of the discovery is alluring. And the beautiful surroundings, fresh air, and the sounds of nature are interrupted only by the occasional late-night/early morning trucker trying to make a deadline.

 

Image: A truck zooms by a collection site towards Ponton at 4 am.

But why are we out there all hours of  the day and night? Even basic knowledge of many species in Manitoba gets to be pretty thin once you get out of the southern quarter of the province. The distributional limits of even common vertebrates like frogs and toads, never mind invertebrates (like spiders and insects), have not been accurately determined. This kind of basic knowledge is important if Manitobans want to know what kind of impact we might be having on the environment, or if we want to know if climate change might be altering living conditions. If we don’t even know where the animals (or plants) live, how can we know if their distributions are changing?

Two images side by side. On the left, a speckled toad on a mossy rock. On the right, a speckled toad on pavement.

In the south, the American toad (Anaxyrus americanus) and Canadian toad (A. hemiophrys) are reported to have a contact zone just east of Winnipeg running south from Patricia Beach to the Canada/U.S. border. Over the last few decades it appears to be moving westward. Is the same happening in the northern parts of the province? We just can’t say because we don’t even know for sure if there IS a contact zone.

 

Image: A Canadian toad, left, faces off with an American toad, right.

Two images side by side. On the left, a predominantly light green frog. On the right, a orangey-brown frog.

This spring, I extended the known range of Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor) northwards to the Saskatchewan River and that of the Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) westwards to almost the border with Saskatchewan. Are these recent species movements or just an artifact of more thorough searching and finding them where they’ve always been?

 

Image: Gray treefrog from near Grand Rapids, left, and spring peeper from Naosap Lake, right.

Future fieldwork by Museum personnel and by other scientists will give a clearer picture of where our animals (and plants) live now, and allow us to monitor these species for any changes in distribution. This seemingly basic information is critical to formulating environmental policy and to making informed decisions about the kind of province we want to live in. It also provides the data necessary to investigate the history of how species re-populated Manitoba after the last ice age. And museums, like The Manitoba Museum, play an important role in providing and archiving this information through fieldwork and collections, as well as analyzing it.

So the next time you call a curator and hear, “I will be unavailable until…”, we might just be trying to figure out what lives in your backyard and how it might have gotten there.

Dr. Randy Mooi

Dr. Randy Mooi

Curator of Zoology

Dr. Mooi received his Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Toronto working on the evolutionary history of coral reef fishes. Following a postdoctoral fellowship in the Division of Fishes of the Smithsonian Institution…
Meet Dr. Randy Mooi

Incoming!

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

At the Museum, events often take place in cycles. Of course we have the cycle of fieldwork and laboratory research, a cycle of exhibit preparation followed by installation, and, like many other workplaces, cycles in which there are periods with many meetings, followed by blessed intervals with very few meetings.

What you may not appreciate is that there are also cycles in our dealings with members of the public. There are quiet periods when I might handle about one inquiry a week, and then there are those other times when it feels like hardly a day passes without at least a couple of calls or e-mails asking me to identify fossils or explain geological phenomena. And invariably, when the inquiries heat up, so do the donations.

The past few weeks have been a very rich period for both inquiries and donations. I have identified some very interesting rocks and fossils, and we have received the three superb donations shown here. It is unusual to receive objects having this sort of quality and significance; to receive three within just a few weeks is quite wonderful!

Fossil starfish are about as rare as Archaeopteryx teeth!  Of course an Archaeopteryx had a lot of teeth, but very few specimens of those teeth have ever been found. It is the same with fossil starfish. I’m sure that there were large numbers of starfish in ancient seas, but starfish are broken up very easily after death, by waves, currents, and scavengers.

This is the first proper starfish we have ever seen from Stony Mountain, even though fossil collectors working in that area have found many thousands of (non-starfish) specimens representing about 100 species (Young et al., 2008). The Museum’s collections also have a Stony Mountain ophiuroid (brittle star) and several crinoids, so this find nicely rounds out the echinoderms from that site.

A fossilized starfish.

An Ordovician starfish (asteroid) from the Stony Mountain Formation at Stony Mountain (about 450 million years old).

Black and white photograph of a Ordovician aged trilobite.

An Ordovician trilobite, possibly Stenopareia garsonensis, from the Red River Formation (Tyndall Stone) at Garson (about 450 million years old).

Tyndall Stone is, of course, one of Canada’s favourite building stones. Trilobites have been found in this rock in the past, but examples that have not disarticulated (gone to pieces) are surprisingly rare (Westrop and Ludvigsen, 1983; Young et al., 2008). The example above is not complete, but the tortuous curve between the cephalon (head) and thorax suggests that the body underwent unusual twisting during or after death. Although trilobites, like other arthropods, grew by moulting, I don’t think this is a moult because the free cheeks (outer parts of the cephalon) are still attached, and they tended to be lost when a trilobite moulted.

PaleoGeo - tusk

This beautiful mammoth tusk arrived about a week ago. It had only been dug out of the ground the day before, and it was soaking wet!  It is surrounded by towels in this photo because we are keeping it wrapped up so that it dries out very slowly over a period of many weeks. If mammoth tusks and teeth are dried too quickly, they tend to go completely to pieces, and we are trying to keep this one as intact as possible. Mammoth tusks are, of course, common in some regions (such as Siberia and Alaska), but only a few are known from Manitoba, and we are delighted to be adding this example to the Museum’s collection. All mammoth specimens from Manitoba seem to belong to the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius), but there are also rare examples of mastodons (Mammut americanum) in the province (see Leith, 1949).

Image: Pleistocene mammoth tusk from southeastern Manitoba (tens of thousands of years old).

 

 

LEITH, EI. 1949. Fossil elephants of Manitoba. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 63: 135-137.

WESTROP, S.R. AND R. LUDVIGSEN. 1983. Systematics and paleoecology of Upper Ordovician trilobites from the Selkirk Member of the Red River Formation, southern Manitoba. Manitoba Energy and Mines, Geological Report GR 82-2, 51 p.

YOUNG, G.A., R.J. ELIAS, S. WONG, AND E.P. DOBRZANSKI. 2008. Upper Ordovician Rocks and Fossils in Southern Manitoba. Canadian Paleontology Conference, Field Trip Guidebook No. 13, CPC-2008 Winnipeg, The Manitoba Museum, 19-21 September 2008, 97 p.