The Scientific Method: A Reality Check

The Scientific Method: A Reality Check

If you have ever heard someone say “I have a theory about that” they don’t. They’re most likely confusing the word “theory” with “completely unsupported, untested hypothesis”. All kidding aside, the words “theory” and “hypothesis” mean something very specific to a scientist, and the former is actually a much stronger statement than the latter. Since most people are not scientists but sometimes need to judge the value of someone’s statements, it can be useful to have at least a rudimentary understanding of how the scientific process works.

The journey to creating a theory is a long and arduous one and, in fact, one that most scientists will only ever contribute peripherally to. But every journey starts with a first step so that is where we will begin. In addition to the scientific jargon, I have taken the liberty of translating it into everyday vernacu… umm, language (it’s hard to stop using big words when you’ve spent 22 years in school).

A cluster of small white flowers with yellow centres, which a bumble bee on the top.

Step 1

Select a topic for study.
Translation: Read so many scientific journals that your eyeballs dry up and your head explodes.

Step 2

Contemplate.
Translation: Think really hard about what you’ve read. Unfortunately thinking looks a lot like slacking off. So keep a file open on your computer and sit in front of it while you’re thinking in case someone walks by. That way it looks like you’re working. Which you are of course, it just doesn’t look like it!

Step 3

State your hypothesis and the opposite of it, which will be the null hypothesis.
Translation: Make an educated guess regarding what will happen.  Or not.

 

Image: Watching bumblebees made me wonder why they visited certain flowers more than others.

A patch of ground with tufty, wild growing grass. On the far side are some folding chairs and a bush with reddish tinged leaves.

Step 4

Design an experiment to test your hypotheses.
Translation: Create a beautifully designed experiment that will win you awards and accolades from your peers!  Fantasize about winning a Nobel prize.

Step 5

Conduct the experiment and collect data.
Translation: Discover that nature really doesn’t like beautifully designed experiments and will vindictively do everything it can (late frosts, hail, floods etc.) to screw with your research so that you have to change everything on the fly just to get some publishable results!

 

Image: A research plot in Spruce Woods Provincial Park, MB.

A hand reaches into frame holding a tuft next to a small cluster of purple flowers.

Step 6

Analyze the data.
Translation: Create so many spreadsheets and conduct so many statistical tests that you can no longer find anything on your computer.

Step 7

Determine which hypothesis was correct and why.
Translation: Shout “eureka” if your hypothesis is correct or “oh nuts”, when it isn’t. If you said “oh nuts” double check your data and analytical techniques just in case you made a mistake. Discover that you didn’t make a mistake. Say “oh nuts!” again. Conduct another literature search to try to figure out why the null hypothesis was correct instead of the hypothesis.

 

Image: I conducted a hand pollination experiment on a rare plant.

Step 8

Write a paper for a peer reviewed journal.
Translation: Spend several months preparing a paper and ensuring that the formatting meets the requirements of the most prestigious journal in your field. Submit. Receive rejection letter. Reformat your paper for a less prestigious journal and submit. Receive scathing peer reviews of your paper. Swear. Reluctantly make suggested changes to the paper while grumbling about it to anyone that will listen. Even more reluctantly conclude that the reviewers’ changes do indeed greatly improve your paper. Submit final version. Send a reprint to your mother.

 

Although I was intentionally being silly, the fact of the matter is that a research project never goes off without a hitch.   Science is certainly one thing: a learning experience.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Open Air Museums in Poland

I was recently asked to attend a conference and weekend festival in Poland regarding historic landscapes in the Vistula River valley. One of the newer public interests in the area happens to be Mennonite history: Mennonites arrived in Poland in the mid-16th century from the Netherlands region and established thriving communities that existed until 1945, when they fled the Soviet advances at the end of World War II.

A large building with a thatched roof. The second storey extends from the centre of the lower storey creating a sheltered overhang.

One of my research interests is Mennonite domestic architecture. I was taken to a house built in 1770 in the village of Chrystkowo (formerly Christefelde) . Two things surprised me: how similar the arrangement of rooms was to Mennonite housebarns I had seen in Manitoba (all built after 1874); and how gigantic these homes could be! Although I had studied Mennonite architecture in Poland on paper, there’s nothing like seeing it in person. After all, that’s why museums are so great – they allow us to see the real objects of history, whose very existence takes us to another level of experience.

 

Image: 1770 Chrystkowo housebarn.

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Curator of History

Roland Sawatzky joined The Manitoba Museum in 2011. He received his B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Winnipeg, M.A. in Anthropology from the University of South Carolina, and Ph.D. in Archaeology…
Meet Dr. Roland Sawatzky

The Value of Professional Conferences

By Kathy Nanowin, past Manager of Conservation

 

I went to the annual conference of the Canadian Association for Conservation (CAC) this year, as I try to do every year. It is held in late spring in a different location in Canada, alternating between different regions of the country. It is not a large conference, with attendance ranging from 70 or so in the smaller cities, to about 150 or even 200 in larger cities such as Toronto. This is because there are not a huge number of conservators in Canada; we are quite a small profession.

Why do professional associations, or any group for that matter, hold conferences? Aren’t they just an excuse to travel somewhere exotic on the corporate or government dime, and drink wine?

The exterior of a large red historic house with white trim.

Historic house in Saint John, New Brunswick, where I attended a conference.

Interior room in a historic house with people seated around tables laid around the room.

The conference banquet was also in a historic building, the Union Club.

Well, no. Conservators have been compared to doctors; the way we care for objects has many similarities to the way doctors care for people. We “operate” (perform treatments) on objects to repair damage that has been done. We also spend a lot of time advising on preventive measures that will keep objects “healthy”; as in human health, prevention is the most important consideration, to prevent or mitigate damage or deterioration. There are also, as in medicine, many scientists working with practitioners (the conservators) to identify needed areas of research, to add to the body of knowledge in our areas of work. New information is always being discovered, as in medicine. That is why we have professional journals, and why we hold conferences.

I’ve been to many conferences over the years I’ve been a conservator. I find that I always learn something, and I always come back to work rejuvenated, with my enthusiasm for my job renewed. Working in cultural heritage in Canada can make one feel fairly isolated. I don’t have that much contact with the general public; I work in a medium-size museum, so I have a lot of museum colleagues, but not that many fellow conservators to talk to. There just aren’t that many of us.

Going to a different Canadian city every year, getting to see different museums, with their great collections, but also challenging situations, is wonderful. However, the best thing about going to professional conferences, for me, is the face to face contact with people. I can read someone’s article in a journal, but to talk to them in person just can’t be replaced. I learn about new conservation treatments, the latest research, shared problems, and the overall mood of the profession. I catch the giant enthusiasm of new graduates.

I personally am able to pay to attend CAC conferences out of my pocket, but I also try to support the attendance of another conservator from the Museum out of departmental budgets, with grant assistance, whenever possible. This is because I firmly believe in the value of professional development, and especially the value of professional conferences.

Celebrating Indigenous Heritage

By Kevin Brownlee, past Curator of Archaeology

 

June 21 is the Summer Solstice and also is the New Year for the Rocky Cree and many other First Nation groups. This day is now recognized as the National Aboriginal Day, celebrating First Nations, Metis and Inuit culture and heritage. To mark this event a huge celebration was held at the Forks in downtown Winnipeg and The Manitoba Museum was one of the exhibitors.

I was pleased to participate that day, honouring my heritage and my ancestors by paddling a 15 foot birch bark canoe down the Assiniboine River to the Forks. For thousands of years my ancestors have paddled the lakes and rivers of this beautiful land; being in the canoe connects me to this past.

My wife Myra and I paddled together and we were welcomed at the Forks by many onlookers, our family and daughter Meghan.

A couple with their arms around each other wearing life jackets standing on a bank next to a canoe in a river.

Getting ready for the paddle.

Two individual seated either end of a canoe, each using paddles to push off from a river bank.

The send off.

A couple standing together holding a toddler as they all stand in front of a canoe raised on saw horses until a canopy.

Kevin, Myra and Meghan at The Manitoba Museum tent with canoe.

Blitzing the Day Away

Last week I went blitzing-BIOblitzing that is. What, you may ask is a BioBlitz? BioBlitz’s are biological surveys that are periodically held by conservation organizations or universities to identify the species of plants, animals and fungi that inhabit a particular tract of land. In Manitoba, the Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) periodically holds BioBlitz’s to identify the species on new properties that it acquires. The BioBlitz that I just participated in was of NCC’s recently acquired Fort Ellice property near the Saskatchewan border, just south of St. Lazare.

Having never been on a BioBlitz before, I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect. It turned out to be two days of hiking along the lovely Assiniboine River Valley, visiting with biologists I hadn’t seen for quite a while and seeing some beautiful rare plants, insects, and birds. It also meant getting covered in ticks and a boot-full of muddy swamp water but those are the normal hazards of field work.

A brown and white Sphinx moth with triangular wings perched among blades of grass.

Newly hatched Sphinx Moth.

Rolling sand dunes with sparse green vegetation growing along them.

Sand dunes along Beaver Creek.

Close up on a small blue flower with a pocket-like centre.

Smooth Blue Beardtongue-a rare Manitoba plant.

Doing a survey with a large group of botanists made the event much more effective because if one of us didn’t know what a plant species was, someone else did. It was as if we had formed one big, really smart superbotanist! In addition to the plant people, there were also birders, a range manager, ecologists, bug catchers, a mammal expert, a couple of fungus guys, and even an archaeologist. We recorded all of the species we saw, and any plant, lichen, or fungus we couldn’t identify was collected to examine in the lab.

Highlights of the trip included spectacular sand dunes, a babbling brook, a recently hatched Sphinx Moth, mating Tiger Moths, and one of the largest morels I’ve ever seen. Now comes the sad part: waiting for the next BioBlitz so I can do it all over again!

A creek next to a rolling green hill.

Beaver Creek early in the morning.

An oblong mushroom with a warm-yellow upper and white root.

A very large (20 cm long) Yellow Morel.

Two white moths on a green leaf.

Tiger moths getting friendly!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Greening Your Garden

Many people love to garden. But the way you garden can have a negative impact on the environment or a positive one. “Green” gardens are cheaper to maintain as they do not require high inputs of water, fertilizers, pesticides, or fossil fuels, and provide habitat for the many wild plants and animals that share our planet. Here are some tips to increase how “green” your garden is.

Close up on a branch of white blossoms on an American Plum tree.
  • Water your lawn infrequently or not at all. Frequent, light watering encourages grass to develop shallow roots, making it more vulnerable to drought than a lawn watered only occasionally but deeply.
  • Thatch build up occurs when you overwater and over-fertilize your lawn; the abundant grass clippings that are generated cannot be decomposed by the soil organisms quickly enough. If you stop fertilizing and watering your lawn, your thatch problems will also disappear. Plus you won’t have to mow as often.
  • Consider buying a push mower. The new push mowers are light and just as easy to push as a gas or electric mower. They also cost less to run, emit no greenhouse gases and are quiet, helping prevent Saturday afternoon noise pollution. Your lawn clippings will fall on the grass and fertilize new growth, reducing your need for chemical fertilizers.

 

Image: Small trees like this American Plum provide food for spring pollinators and edible fruits for you!

  • Consider replacing some of the lawn you don’t use with trees, shrubs and/or flowers as they provide better habitat for beneficial insect and birds.
  • Correct placement of trees and shrubs can also improve the energy efficiency of your home. Evergreens planted on the north side of your house block cold north winds while deciduous trees on the south side let the sun warm your home in winter but block it in the summer when it’s hot.
  • Don’t even try to grow grass in dense shade. Cover with mulch or plant hardy, attractive, native ground covers like Western Canada Violet or Canada Anemone.

A small bushy plant with small white flowers.

Western Canada Violet makes a great ground cover for shady areas.

An orange butterfly perched on a frilly purple flower.

Butterflies love Wild Bergamot.

A frilly blue-purple flower with a bumble bee on the centre.

The exotic Bachelor’s Buttons attracts pollinators like bees.

  • Grow at least some native plants in your yard. Native plants are adapted for the climatic conditions that we get in Manitoba, requiring no fertilizers or supplemental watering when grown in the proper spot. Native plants provide food for many birds and beneficial insects like bees and hoverflies.
  • If you like to grow exotic plants, include some that provide food for birds and/or insects. Many horticultural species like hydrangeas, peonies, begonias and fancy “double flowers” are not very attractive to our native pollinators. Exotic plants that do provide food for pollinators include: columbine, delphinium, globe thistle, mint, oregano, Goat’s-beard, and many more.
  • Add some features, such as bird baths, butterfly salt licks, or nesting boxes, to your yard to make it more attractive to wildlife.
  • Use organic or “hands on” methods to control pests. More pesticides per hectare are used on people’s gardens than on cropland. We often forget that insecticides kill more than just crop pests-they also kill the beneficial pollinators that we depend on to produce much of our food. Neonicotinoids appear to be particularly harmful to bees (read more). Children and pets are also more vulnerable to the dangers that these chemicals pose.
  • Compost your kitchen scraps and yard waste (i.e. leaves, grass clippings, dead plants) to obtain cheap, organic garden fertilizer. Artificial fertilizers require lots of fossil fuel energy to produce and, when used incorrectly and excessively, contribute to the pollution of local lakes and rivers. Use the compost in your vegetable garden, flower beds, or sprinkled evenly over your lawn.

 

Image: Asters provide colour in your garden in the fall and are popular with bees and butterflies.

  • Remember to put your yard waste  out for collection along with your recyclables and garbage if you live in Winnipeg.
  • For more information on green gardening pick up the “Naturescape Manitoba” book published by the Manitoba Naturalists Society (Nature Manitoba).
Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Pollen, Predators, and Parasites

Last summer I went to Spruce Woods Provincial Park to determine which insects pollinate the rare Hairy Prairie-clover plant, a species that only occurs in sand dunes. Oddly enough, even though Hairy Prairie-clover is rare, it was being visited more frequently than some of the common plants I have observed. But there was a dark side to all that activity: it was drenched in blood-the blood of innocents! Instead of the cute, fuzzy little bumblebees I had grown accustomed to watching, I encountered big, black and yellow or red wasps and large, colourful wasp-like flies! What were those crazy creatures? When I got my insect identifications back recently, I was shocked to discover that 40% of the species and 67% of the insect visits to Hairy Prairie-clover were by solitary hunting wasps and parasitic flies that prey on other insects.

The Sand Wasp (Bembix pruinosa) was the most frequent flower visitor to Hairy Prairie-clover. Although adult Sand Wasps consume pollen and nectar, the females also capture and paralyze small flies (e.g. Soldier and Horse Flies) to feed to their babies. The Sand Wasp larvae and paralyzed prey are well hidden in underground burrows. A related species of wasp called a “bee-wolf” (Philanthus sp.) was observed capturing and flying away with tiny Andrenid Bees (Perdita perpallida) that were busy pollinating Hairy Prairie-clover.

A small black and yellow striped wasp on a purple bulb-like flower.

Sand Wasp on Hairy Prairie-clover.

A very small pale green insect on the underside of a purple bulb-like flower.

A small Sweat Bee unaware of the fact that it is about to become a wasp’s breakfast.

The Common Thread-waisted Wasp (Ammophila procera) is also a solitary hunting wasp but captures the caterpillars of Noctuid moths called Prominents (Notodontidae) instead of flies. A similar looking species, the Great Black Wasp (Sphex pensylvanicus), captures and paralyzes grasshopper or katydid larvae, and lays an egg on it to act as baby food. The Grasshopper Bee Fly (Systoechus vulgaris) also parasitizes grasshopper eggs. The female Grasshopper Bee Fly shoots her eggs in an area of loose soil suspected to contain grasshopper eggs. The hatched larvae crawl around in the soil until they find a suitable grasshopper host and then they suck it dry!

Similarly, the larvae of large Scoliid Wasps (Trielis octomaculata), are ectoparasites on Scarab Beetle (Scarabaeidae) larvae. The large females hunt down the beetle larvae in the soil, paralyze them and lay an egg on them. Some Scoliid wasps have even been used for the biocontrol of white grubs on sugar cane crops.

A green insect with a leaf-like appearance and long antennae sits on an oblong purple flower.

Katydid resting on Hairy Prairie-clover; another unsuspecting victim!

A large black and yellow wasp on a purple oblong flower.

The predatory Scoliid Wasp enjoying some pollen!

A patch of sand with a number of small holes, burrow entrances, along it.

Many wasps have their burrows in loose sand on the dunes.

And those wasp-like flies? They were Conopid or Thick-headed Flies. The female flies lay their eggs inside bees or wasps. The hatched larva then slowly eats its host until it dies, eventually bursting from the exoskeleton after pupation.

Ironically, even the parasitic wasps are themselves parasitized. The females of the Bee Fly Exoprosopa shoot their eggs into the burrows of solitary hunting wasps, and the hatched larvae develop as external parasitoids. What a fascinating series of biological interactions surrounding just a single plant. Clearly it’s an insect-eat-insect-eat-insect-eat-plant world out there!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Three Days in the Interlake

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

Looking through my window at the still-snowy, still-wintry Winnipeg streetscape, I have to remind myself that spring is not far away. Soon the snow will leave and we will again be able to begin one of the most pleasurable of the Museum’s activities: fieldwork. Last year, between various other projects, I worked with Bob Elias (University of Manitoba) and Ed Dobrzanski on gathering information that we could use in a field guidebook for this spring’s Winnipeg GAC-MAC meeting (Geological Association of Canada – Mineralogical Association of Canada).

Two individuals walking down a path of trimmed autumn vegetation. Bare trees and evergreens lined the path.

Most of the sites we planned to include in the guidebook were well known to us, but there was one glaring absence: Bob and I had never seen the type section for the Lower Silurian Fisher Branch Formation, and Ed had visited it just once almost 50 years ago! From the published scientific work we knew where the site should be: all we had to do was to visit and document it. This seemed like a straightforward mission, as we already had maps and a geographic position, but as it turned out we made three trips to the Fisher Branch area before the work was complete.

 

Image: Tramping through the woods in October.

The first trip, in late May, was after several days of rain. We found the right roads, we located the property on which the site should be located, and we met and received help from the very kind owners of the property. But the roads were continuous mud in places, and we were told that the field track to the site would be impassable that day. We would need to come back later when the weather had been dry for a while.

Two individuals standing on a rough gravel path next to a grassy space and some green-leaved trees. Ons of the individuals is holding and examining a handheld device.

On the first day out, Ed gathers GPS data from a little patch of bedrock outcrop some distance from the actual locality, while it appears that Bob is not really enjoying the misty weather.

Two individuals getting into a car on the same side. The car is very dirty and dusty, and on a road worn into a grassy-stretch. A dog approaches from in front of the car.

No, the collie did not chase us into the car. It was extremely friendly, and just wanted us to hang around longer!

An individual standing in front of a shoulder high fence. On the other wise is a herd of cows staring towards the individual.

Bob demonstrates “cow-whispering” skills of which Ed and I had been previously unaware. Bob says later that they were more attentive than his human classes often are, though their attention did not seem to last very long.

A very dirty, dusty car parked next to a field with a large Canada goose statue.

This is what the car looked like after we had finished many miles on muddy roads. Ed and Bob are inside, but you can’t really see them through the nearly-opaque windows. That’s the Lundar Goose in the background.

The second day was one of those hot, dry, breezy July days. The air motion was sufficient to cool us and to keep mosquitoes and flies from being too much of a nuisance. We drove through fields almost to the site, without even getting dirt on the car! Tucking trousers into socks to keep the nasty wood ticks from climbing our legs (this may look goofy, but it works), we pushed through the dense brush. We rapidly discovered four nice scarp sections in the trees. The farthest of these looked promising because it showed the best exposure of the Stonewall Formation, which lies under the Fisher Branch. This site, however, turned out to be already occupied: a bear grunted and huffed from the underlying crevice when we got too close!

We quickly decided to measure the next section along instead. Data and rock samples were easily gathered, but we could not get decent photos of the rocks because the view was blocked by foliage whichever way we turned. We would need to return in the autumn, after the trees had lost their leaves.

Two individuals near a red car parked in wild grass in front of a dense tree line.

In the perfect July weather, Bob (right) and I unload gear at the edge of the field. (photo by Ed Dobrzanski)

Two individuals on the top of a rocky outcropping in a treed area. Both are wearing their pants tucked into their long socks.

Success! Bob and Ed on top of a bedrock scarp.

An orange and black butterfly on a small yellow flower.

A small green fern popping up to the sunlight from between two rocks.

A small orange wood tick on a opaque material.

A wood tick that, thanks to the “pants tucked into socks” approach, was discovered on the outside of my clothing.

By mid October the leaves were all gone and the weather was still lovely; ideal for our final “day out” near Fisher Branch. We stopped at Stony Mountain and Stonewall to check out conditions at those localities, then drove north to Fisher Branch by lunchtime. In the field beside the sites we were met by a large herd of cows (perhaps the Interlake should be advertised as “Land of Cows”?), some of which became very interested in our Jeep. The bear was apparently no longer in residence at the farthest scarp, so we were free to examine the rock, take photographs, and gather a set of isotope samples. Later in the afternoon, we tramped up over the hill above the scarp, just to make sure that there was no further unexamined outcrop.

It was a perfect autumn day; the last perfect field day of the year, as it turned out. Our drive to Grand Rapids under rather less pleasant conditions was to follow just a couple of days later.

A light-coloured Jeep parked in a field. A cow appears to be licking the side of the vehicle as two others stand nearby.

It is good that Jeeps are designed to take a licking.

A rock wall with moss and lichen growing along the top. In the centre a tape measure hangs from a ridge, extending the length of the centre third of the wall.

The body of the tape measure rests at the boundary between the Stonewall Formation (below) and Fisher Branch Formation (above). That boundary is now considered to also represent the Ordovician-Silurian Boundary, so this site is very significant as the only place this systemic boundary can be observed in southern Manitoba. Length of the tape measure is 1 metre.

Close-up on some lichens growing on bark.

An old farm building with a folding chair and metal washbasin outside next to a window with peeling orange trim and drawn curtains on the other side of the fogged glass.

The farm includes several wonderful buildings from the original Ukrainian settlement of this area, about a century ago.

Close-up on the window in the previous image. On the exterior of the old wooden walls hangs a metal washbasin. The window trim is orange and peeling. Inside some clutter is up against he window glass, seen between the drawn curtains.

An old farm building with a metal roof and wooden walls and doors. On of the two double doors is open, revealing overgrown grass creeping inside.

People find the darndest things – first confirmed barn owl for Manitoba this Century

[Note: This blog contains descriptions and images that may not be suitable for sensitive individuals.] 

A taxidermized great gray owl specimen mounted on a branch.

When thinking of Manitoba’s owls, the great gray (our provincial bird) is usually the first to come to mind, whereas of the 12 species recorded for the province, the barn owl (Tyto alba) would likely be the last. Although barn owls have one of the widest ranges of any owl species, occurring in temperate and tropical regions around the world, they are very rare anywhere in Canada, and especially so on the prairies. They just don’t do very well in our climate; -35°C is hardly tropical or even temperate! There are only about a dozen records for barn owl in Manitoba since the first was found in November of 1912, and several of these are sight records only – they are convincing, but remain unconfirmed by photos or specimen evidence. There is one recorded (failed) nesting attempt in 1994 in Springstein, about 20km west of Winnipeg, and this is the last confirmed sighting. [See the excellent species account in The Birds of Manitoba available from Nature Manitoba (www.naturemanitoba.ca ).]

 

Image: Not a barn owl, but a great gray owl, Manitoba’s provincial bird. This is a mounted Museum specimen (MM 3.6-901) from southern Manitoba collected in February 1917.

So imagine my surprise in mid-December when a report of an expired (and frozen) barn owl from a farm near Elie, Manitoba arrived in my e-mail inbox from Manitobabirds (a birding listserve)! The importance of the find was not lost on its discoverer, Mr. Dick Steppler, so he collected the bird and brought it to Jim Duncan of Manitoba Conservation. Jim has been banding and studying various owl species, particularly great gray and hawk owls for, well, probably longer than he’d care to admit, and has published several books and lectured extensively on these species. So Jim was the logical choice to notify about the barn owl, and, fortunately for the Museum, he has always been a great supporter of our collections, recognizing their value as both a repository and as a research tool. Our bird collection would soon contain Manitoba’s first record of barn owl for this century and the first in over 18 years!

But before it came to the Museum, it was off to Dr. Terry Galloway of the Entomology Department of the University of Manitoba. Among his many areas of expertise, Terry is an authority on external bird parasites, and because finding barn owls is so unusual, it was important to try to get as much information as possible from the specimen. Despite his careful inspection, this owl seemed free of external parasites.

I went to pick up the bird from his office and brought it back to the Museum. Under my and (mostly) Janis Klapecki’s guidance (our Collections Specialist), the bird would be prepared as a study skin by Laurel McDonald. Laurel is a wonderfully skilled volunteer who has been processing bird specimens for us over the last few years. Preparing a study skin is different from taxidermy, although it uses some of the same techniques; it is the finished product that is different. With the number of bird specimens we hold (over 6300), it would be far too time consuming and take too much storage space to create taxidermy mounts for each one.

An individual wearing gloves working on a bird specimen in front of them.

Volunteer bird preparator extraordinaire, Laurel McDonald, beginning to dissect the Elie barn owl to make a study skin.

Collections storage, three drawers, all containing owl specimens, open to varying distance.

A cabinet of great gray owl specimens (Strix nebulosa). These are study skins arranged on their backs. Note that if these were all taxidermied mounts, they would require six or seven cabinets rather than one. Taxidermy is also a much more time-consuming and expensive process.

The barn owl was found frozen, but had been thawed a couple of times, once by Mr. Steppler to clean and reposition the bird, and another time by Terry in order to wash it for external parasites. Because there was no certainty as to when the owl had expired, we had no idea of what condition it would be in or whether it could even be made into specimen. If it had been outside a long time, it could either have decomposed substantially or it might have “freeze-dried.” In either case, there would be little we could do but make a skeleton.

To our surprise, the owl was in quite good condition (for a dead bird!), meaning it probably had not been long on the ground before it was found, but just long enough to freeze. To make the study skin, the bird is thawed, an incision is made along the belly, and the skin is peeled back from the body and over the head to be turned inside out. The body, including skeleton is removed with only the lower leg bones, some wing bones and the skull remaining with the skin. The skin is then turned right-side-out, stuffed with cotton and stiffened with a wooden rod to be arranged to lie flat on its back. The vital organs are examined for internal parasites (we found none), checked for general condition, stomach contents examined (although this specimen had none), and the sex organs are checked to determine gender and measured to assess condition. We saved some tissue for future DNA work, in case that is required, and the bones not left with the skin will be cleaned by dissection and in the “bug tank”, a special sealed treatment area that houses beetle larvae that will eat the flesh off the bones to make a clean skeleton.

Barn owls, like many birds, are difficult to sex externally with any confidence. Because this bird was quite buffy with relatively large spots on its breast, we were pretty sure it was a female, but couldn’t be positive. In most birds of prey the females are larger than males. In barn owls, females are bigger on average, but there is considerable overlap in measurements between the sexes. Dissection conclusively determined that this owl was a female. Plumage also suggested that it was a hatch year bird, meaning that it was under one year of age when it died. Although the bird was very emaciated (it had no fat at all), it seemed otherwise in pretty good shape and likely died of starvation. There was some indication of trauma and bruising on the lower right leg, but the bone didn’t appear to be broken, so it didn’t seem enough to explain its death.  There were two holes in the skin of the right wing that we initially thought might be due to decomposition after death, but because the rest of the bird seemed in good shape, these might have been indicative of injury – although there was no evidence of bleeding so these are likely to be postmortem. The exact cause of death will remain unknown.

A owl specimen with the chest cavity surgically opened for dissection. Beside the specimen is a stick wrapped with cotton to about the width of the owl's torso.

The Elie barn owl emptied of internal organs and most of the skeleton including the backbone. It has been turned right-side out and is ready for insertion of a cotton wad around a stick (top of photo) to give the study skin some shape and stiffness.

An owl sparsely swaddled to hold it in repose shape with its wings to its side. Hand reach in from the left side of the frame, tying off the wrapping.

The study skin has been sewn up and is being wrapped for final drying before being placed with the main collection.

An individual sitting at a desk looking at the internal organs of an owl through a microscope.

Examining the internal organs of the Elie barn owl to check for parasites, general condition, and clues to explain its demise. This is also the only way to definitively determine its gender; it was a female.

Two photos, one above the other, of an owl specimen. One looking down on the specimen, and one looking from the side in profile.

It is certainly unfortunate that the first confirmed record of barn owl for Manitoba this century was an expired individual. But with the specimen now in The Manitoba Museum collection, it provides a permanent record of its occurrence and it is available for study by the likes of Jim Duncan or other owl specialists. Given the unlikely possibility of finding this specimen before it was carried off by a coyote or became buried or otherwise dispersed, one wonders how many other records of rare species like the barn owl are missed. Even specimens of common birds are extremely valuable for the Museum collection. In many ways, common birds can tell us more about our environment because we have the “luxury” of statistical power – one specimen is a curiosity or even anomaly, but several specimens can provide a pattern and tell a coherent story. And bird collecting, in the historical sense, just doesn’t happen anymore (probably for the good!), so the Museum collections grow slowly. But the addition of the rare finds like the Elie barn owl, along with window-killed specimens of common species make valuable contributions to our understanding of Manitoba’s birds.

 

Image: “Top” and side view of the finished study skin of the Elie barn owl (Tyto alba) (MM 1.2-5418). Note the buffy breast and relatively large spots that hinted that this was a female. Dissection confirmed the gender. Scale bars are in centimeters.

Stay on the lookout for the unusual any time you are outside. You never know what exciting contributions you might make to our province’s natural history. A special thanks to the sharp-eyed Elie resident, Dick Steppler, who recognized the value of his discovery. Generations of researchers can now benefit from his thoughtful addition to the Museum collections.

Dr. Randy Mooi

Dr. Randy Mooi

Curator of Zoology

Dr. Mooi received his Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Toronto working on the evolutionary history of coral reef fishes. Following a postdoctoral fellowship in the Division of Fishes of the Smithsonian Institution…
Meet Dr. Randy Mooi

A Once Sticky Situation

By Lisa May, past Conservator

 

When performing inventory and maintenance in the museum galleries, the collections and conservation staff sometimes discover things which are questionable museum practices.

This month while working in The Sod House exhibit, we discovered some artifacts had a substance resembling adhesive on the bottom of them. After discussions with senior staff it was found that in the 1970s when the exhibit had originally been an open exhibit, not enclosed behind a Plexiglas door, artifacts were glued to surfaces to prevent them from being stolen. Obviously, this was an act executed long ago, possibly by a non-collections staff member, as we are all now aware this is not an appropriate method for securing or mounting artifacts in an exhibit. Conservation knowledge and theory have advanced and changed significantly since this exhibit was installed in the 1970s; we would not glue things down this way today.

Next steps included removing the artifacts from the exhibit and taking them to the conservation lab and, after condition reporting and taking photographs, trying to remove the adhesive without damaging the artifacts. Luckily, as a significant amount of time had passed, the adhesive had dried out and lost its “sticky” properties and with a hammer and chisel (not what we usually consider cleaning tools in conservation), we were able to chip the adhesive off with no damage to the artifacts.

A large shiny silver kettle.

This kettle is one of the artifacts in the Sod Hut.

The bottom of a large silver kettle with the remains of a crusty brown adhesive around the bottom.

Bottom view shows the old adhesive.

The bottom of a large silver kettle with a stain on the bottom, but the remnants of the adhesives removed.

The old, hardened adhesive was removed successfully; the brighter area shows where it was.

The artifacts were then returned to exhibit and collections and conservation staff continue to perform inventory and maintenance in the galleries, hoping not to find too many other unwanted surprises!