Hands On: Practising Emergency Response

Hands On: Practising Emergency Response

The 37th annual Canadian Association for Conservation conference was held in Winnipeg in May 2010. Conservator Lisa May attended a two-day pre-conference workshop entitled “Advanced Issues in Emergency Preparedness and Response”. As part of this workshop, Jane Dalley from Heritage Conservation Service (Winnipeg, MB), instructed a hands-on component. Workshop participants experienced how to handle, stabilize and clean water damaged items.

A row of people suiting up in white protective clothing and face masks.

Participants wear protective clothing. In an emergency scenario, there could be dust, mould, and water

A variety of objects including a rug, painting, notebooks, cassette tapes, floppy dusks, and more piled on the floor.

A variety of objects made of different materials had to be rescued.

Four people wearing white protective clothing sorting various artifacts into trays and boxes.

The different materials are triaged and separated according to how they will be treated.

A series of painting an photographs laid out on paper towels on the floor. In the background the legs of four people wearing protective clothing can be seen.

In one room, wet objects are laid to dry on paper towels and clear polyethylene.

A small tapestry and two prints laid out on a cotton sheet.

In another space, things are drying on a cotton sheet. Notice dye has run on the print.

Objects like CDs, CD cases, floppy disks, and film slides laid on a small table made from pipe and netting.

Still more objects are laid out on a homemade table made from plumbing pipe.

A wet notebook with paper towels inserted between each page to aid in drying.

Paper towels are placed between pages to speed drying.

An individual wearing white protective clothing, blue rubber gloves, and a white face mask kneels on the ground next to a shop vac and an old and worn straw hat.

A shop vac is useful in a flood or leak.

This was just one part of the workshop. Lectures and discussion to share experiences and questions were an invaluable aspect, but hands-on practice opportunities are rarer. Thanks go to the Canadian Conservation Institute, helped by local organizer Ala Rekrut from the Archives of Manitoba for presenting this professional development opportunity.

So Much Sun, So Little Time!

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

This past week, I again appreciated the relationship between fieldwork and weather. In previous visits to Churchill, we usually had breaks in the outdoor work because of the region’s varied and often unpleasant weather. This year, I had anticipated that we would meet similar conditions, and that I would be able to fit some blog posts into the time at the research station waiting for rain/sleet/snow to clear.

But of course this was not to be, courtesy of unpredictable weather conditions. This time, we were met by the longest run of fine weather I have ever seen on the Hudson Bay coast. We could occasionally complain that it was unusually hot (i.e., a pleasant mid 20s Celsius), and the flies WERE horrible whenever the wind died down, but really we had nothing to complain about.

Silhouettes of three people walking through shallow water on a beach, backlit by the sun.

Crossing a tidal flat in the early evening.

View into the back of a covered pickup truck with neatly placed containers and boxes.

Debbie keeps the back of the truck in remarkable order. I have never before seen a geological field vehicle looking this tidy.

No two days were the same, but a typical day went like this:

6:30 am – The northern sun has already been beating through our window for hours. It is time to struggle out of bed, shave, and face the day.

7 am – Breakfast. Food is very good and plentiful at the Churchill Northern Studies Centre, so this is always a pleasant experience, with eggs, potatoes, bacon, coffee, fruit, cinnamon buns, … roughing it in the field! After breakfast we will make sandwiches, then load gear into the truck.

8 am – Drive 25 km down the gravel road to our main study site. Unload collecting gear, attach kneepads, load shotguns, fill water pails from a pond on the tidal flat. The rock we are seeking is a not quite in-place bedrock, but its loose blocks have a very distinctive appearance and appear to come from just under our feet. I select a likely spot on the shore and pick up and split every piece of this rock type within reach, wetting the surfaces in the pail and examining with a hand lens for tiny fossils.

9, 10, 11 am – We continue to repeat the splitting and examining processes. I occasionally stand up, grumble about leg and knee pain, and scan the horizon for polar bears (Ed is holding a shotgun and acting as full-time bear patrol; my scanning is of marginal importance, but it makes me feel useful). I go and take a look whenever Debbie or Matt call out about a fossil they have found.

An individual seated crossed-legged on a rocky surface next to a black bucket. They have the hood of their top up, and a rimmed hat.

Matt works through the blocks of stone on one little patch of shore. The shirt and hat protect him from both sun and biting flies.

Individuals standing and seated scattered around a rocky outcropping look for specimens. In the distance is a body of water.

Matt, Sean, Debbie, and Dave, collecting on the shore in the hot sun.

12:30 – Lunch. I find a nice rounded boulder low on the shore, and pull out the sandwich that I made at breakfast. Sandwiches always taste so much better when inhaled with sea air!

1 pm – A quick run to town to purchase supplies. There is always something we need for this sort of work, and town is nearby, so it makes a welcome break.

2 pm – Back on the shore, we are splitting rock. The sun has become hot and blinding, and this gets to be sleepy work. If the tide is out, maybe we will take a little breather at 3 and walk lower on the shore to examine fossils in the bedrock of the intertidal zone.

4 pm – We begin to pack up. Every likely slab that we had set aside is re-examined to determine if it is worthy of transport back to the research station. The good ones are wrapped in foam and carefully placed into bins. These fossils are easily abraded, and it would be a shame if we wrecked them after they have survived in good shape for 450 million years or so!

5 pm – Back at the Centre, we unload the gear and rocks, and wash up a bit to make ourselves marginally presentable. If there is time, we will examine a few of our finds before dinner.

Three individuals standing in a work room/laboratory sorting fossils and specimens.

Sorting fossils and gear in the lab in the old part of the Churchill Northern Studies Centre.

Standing water collected in a dip in the gravel road.

Our evening drives took us over several of Churchill’s interesting roads! This one is near Halfway Point.

In individual wearing a red jacket and a rimmed beige hat with mosquitoes swarming around their head.

5:30 pm – Dinner! In the cafeteria, it is time to talk about our discoveries of the day, plan for tomorrow, and maybe talk to the Centre staff and other scientists about what they have been doing.

6:30 pm – We are back to the truck, ready to pay a visit to one of the field sites from previous years. The weather is so wonderful, the light is perfect for photography, and we need to look at some of the sites on the shore to see if they have changed or “new” fossils have popped up. This is no hardship at all: one evening we wade through a quiet mist toward the middle of Bird Cove, another time we head along the beach ridges east of Halfway Point, and on a third occasion we travel down “Polar Bear Alley” near the former dump site. Everywhere the scenery is gorgeous, the animal life is interesting, the bears are not in evidence (this is important when we are out on foot!), and even the malevolent mosquitoes only trouble us for relatively brief intervals.

 

Image: Sometimes the mosquitoes WERE bad: evening feeding time with Dave.

9, 10, 11 pm – After our final return to the Centre, we spend a bit more time working on our fossil collections, perhaps socialize over a beer, and then return to our rooms to download some of the hundreds of photographs.

It has been a perfect field day, but also perfectly jam-packed. The only thing we could wish for more of is time. I wish that this particular batch of Churchill fieldwork could last a month, not just nine days; then I would really have enough time to appreciate the experience.

Back in Churchill

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

We arrived in Churchill last night after a long hiatus; I hadn’t been here in six years. I hadn’t really thought that I missed the place, since I get to think about it so often, but when I hit the ground I was again shocked by how strikingly beautiful it all is.

Three people wearing backpacks boarding a plane from the tarmac. The last person in line turns to look back towards the photographer.

Boarding the plane from the runway in Winnipeg, are (L-R) Dave Rudkin, Matt Demski, and Ed Dobrzanski.

Looking out over a body of water towards a partially emerged shipwreck lit by sunlight breaking through dark clouds.

In the sunset, the long-wrecked Ithica appears to be under way!

I am here with some old “Churchill hands” (Dave Rudkin and Ed Dobrzanski) and some newcomers to the place (Debbie Thompson and Matt Demski). Sean Robson will join us later. I plan to post a few short pieces here to document our progress; we will have to see how this works.

We took a drive at sunset to get acclimated. Today so far has consisted of unpacking and organizing gear and driving to town for a few supplies. But that was not without its excitements; we saw a big white wolf on the way there, and a polar bear mother and cub on the drive back!

This afternoon, the real work begins. It is a pity that the weather has turned cooler with rain threatened, but hey, this is Churchill!

Wide-view shot of several people standing around taking photos and exploring on rocky ground near a parked pickup truck.

Taking photos at Halfway Point.

An individual crouches down near the rocky ground holding a camera. Behind them a truck with a covered bed is parked with the back hatch open, and in the foreground is a standing individual wearing a red baseball cap.

Matt and Debbie.

Two polar bears walking away over a raised rocky area towards a treeline.

This morning’s bears (photo by Dave Rudkin, Royal Ontario Museum).

Confessions of a Genuine Science Geek

For the last several weeks I have been recording the pollinators of wild flowers in Birds Hill Provincial Park. One rather windy and uneventful day I was able to reflect on my chosen profession and was forced to conclude that I am a science geek. I remembered an old episode of the Simpsons where Bart discovers a comet. While searching the heavens with Bart, Principal Seymour Skinner says, “There’s nothing more exciting than science! You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention – science has it all!” That pretty much describes what I’ve been doing for the last seven years: sitting quietly, waiting for an insect to land on a flower, and writing down the number of flowers she/he visits. In the winter I identify plants and insects, study the data I collected, make graphs, run statistical analyses, and write scientific papers. The funny part is that I really do find it exciting. It’s fun to find out if the patterns you surmised while in the field were real or indistinguishable from nature’s background noise. Plus, there’s nothing more thrilling than correctly identifying a mysterious species of sedge! Hence my revelation and this confession.

A small, six-petaled purple flower with a yellow centre.

I love staring at the delicate Blue-eyed grass flowers!

View looking out over a prairie grassland, with a single fir tree in the mid ground, and a tree line in the distance.

My summertime office.

I know that to some (probably all those extroverted people out there) my job sounds dull and tedious (a bit like watching paint dry, perhaps).  But for an introvert like me, who is energized by solitude, it’s actually the perfect job.  Being in a crowded, noisy environment with lots of people around would just drain me.

Perhaps I’m being a little too self depracating though.  Having a job where you’re constantly stuck indoors on beautiful summer days isn’t that great either.  I get to watch all sorts of wildlife while I do my work, smell fragrant wildflowers and feel the wind on my face.  Plus I don’t need to take any vitamin D tablets (skin cancer’s a possibility though).  The fact of the matter is some people pay money to do what I get paid to do: observing and photographing wildlife.  I can’t imagine too many people paying money to be a lawyer or a stockbroker for a day.

 

Image: One of the facinating creatures I share my work space with: a crab spider.

I also take solace in the fact that the specimens and data I collect will probably be studied long after I’m dead.  Not everyone can say that about their life’s work.  So even though I am a science geek, I don’t mind at all.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

… packed up and ready to go …

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

In a couple of weeks we will be doing fieldwork near Churchill, collecting fossils on the shore of Hudson Bay. We will be flying up, and therefore have a limited checked baggage allowance. Paleontological fieldwork is not a lightweight pursuit, so the mound of gear shown above was shipped off this morning, taking the slow surface route by truck and train (Churchill has no road link to the rest of Canada).

A stack of boxed supplies packed for transport. At the base a large blue crate, with two blue rubber bins on top of it. Topping off the pile, a long light-coloured wood crate and a red toolbox.

We tried to limit what we are taking, but these crates and boxes together weigh about 260 pounds (more than 100 kg). They hold hammers, chisels, pry bars, bags, packing materials, gumboots, pails, brushes … all the heavy or bulky paraphernalia associated with successful fieldwork. And if that fieldwork is successful, they will be returning to the Museum much heavier still, loaded with samples!

As we were packing up, I started to think about the history of some of the items we are taking. We were cleaning cloth field bags, some of which have tags showing that they date back to provincial survey fieldwork in the 1950s and 60s. That blue crate in the photo has been to Churchill many times in the past 15 years (including the trip when we found the giant trilobite), and was itself inherited from an earlier generation of Museum scientists. Some of the tools are also becoming rather “aged.”

At some point, should some of our everyday scientific items be assessed, to determine if they will become artifacts in a different Museum collection?

Chasing Ghosts in Brandon

Imagine yourself in the basement of the science building at Brandon University, on a Saturday morning in the summer. The place seems to be abandoned, with the hum of the lights and ventilation the only sounds you hear. Opening a door, you walk into a quiet, darkened laboratory. A curtain closes off one end of the room, and something behind that curtain emits an eerie blue-green glow.

Close-up on a green-lit fossil seaweed.

An Ordovician fossil seaweed from Airport Cove, Churchill, photographed with UV radiation and a green filter.

A computer screen shining through a curtain in a dark room.

Tiptoeing closer, you observe that there is a man behind the curtain, huddled over a pair of computer screens. Beside the computer, a scientific instrument is producing a blinding bluish light. Who is this mad scientist, and what are the nefarious schemes that bring him here at this strange time?

Actually, the man is me, and I am looking at fossils. I travelled to Brandon to use the fine microscope in their Environmental Science Laboratory, by kind invitation from Dr. David Greenwood. At the Museum we have good microphotography equipment, but I had reached its limits trying to sort out the fine structure of some of our unusual fossils. When I visited Brandon a few months ago, David suggested that I might want to try their scope system, which was set up with the aid of a large grant from the Government of Canada.

Two full computer monitors illuminated in a dark room. To the left of the screens is a large microscope shining a blue light onto the base platform.

The digital camera on the binocular microscope feeds into a dual display computer.

Close-up on two computer screens displaying images being picked up through the digital telescope.

The panel on the left screen allows you to select the area being photographed, and to spot focus the image. The right screen shows the captured images.

So a couple of weeks ago, I hauled a variety of fossils out to Brandon, and spent a few days on the binocular scope seeing what it could tell me. It is a lovely Olympus setup, with full digital image capture and focusing, and a variety of illumination options. It took me quite a while to figure out how to get good photos of our material, but once I had it sorted I was very happy with what it could do.

My research colleagues and I are trying to sort out the fine structure of some of the unusual fossils we have collected in the Grand Rapids Uplands and the Churchill area, things like horseshoe crabs, eurypterids, and jellyfish. I felt a bit rushed trying to look at the many specimens of these, but in several instances I was struck by the sudden realization that I was seeing features that I had never been able to make out before.

Close-up on a piece of a fossil showing numerous legs of an Ordovician eurypterid.

Some of the legs of an Ordovician eurypterid (“sea scorpion”) from the Grand Rapids Uplands.

Close-up on a speckled fossil of an Ordovician arthropod.

Spectacularly preserved cuticle of an Ordovician arthropod (joint-legged animal) from Airport Cove, Churchill.

A series of images taken of a fossil displayed on a computer screen.

The front image is a UV photo of the central part of a fossil jellyfish from the Grand Rapids Uplands.

This sense was particularly striking when I was able to image specimens under ultraviolet. Although none showed the bright fluorescence I had hoped for, some of the images were very different from those under standard lighting. With their odd greenish glow, I sometimes felt as though I was seeing the ghosts of the long-departed creatures.

Speaking of Vacuuming…

A significant part of the conservator’s job is cleaning. At the Manitoba Museum, our numerous open dioramas require regular vacuuming. The larger dioramas require a team of staff including the Conservators, Diorama Artist, Exhibit Assistant, and whichever Collections Assistants we can round up. We try to get to every diorama once a year.

A dark-haired woman wearing white coveralls and a red backpack vacuum as she holds the hose to vacuum off the face of a taxidermized bison.

Lisa vacuums a bison.

A woman crouches under a taxidermized moose as she holds the nozzle of a vacuum onto a screen covering a rock in the diorama.

Vacuuming through a screen in the Boreal Forest diorama.

The vacuuming must be done carefully, so parts are not pulled off. That’s why we use screens, and vacuums that are portable and have adjustable suction.

Sometimes, for vacuuming small and/or fragile artifacts or specimens, we put screening over the vacuum nozzle, or use micro-attachments made for cleaning computers and other electronic equipment.

A teal bodied vacuum with a hose loosely wound around the body.

We use household vacuums for most things.

An individual holds up the nozzle and hose of a vacuum cleaner from out of frame, and with their other hand uses a small brush to brush dirt towards the mouth of the vacuum.

Brushing dust into the vacuum.

Close-up on the nozzle of a vacuum cleaner with screening held over it with an elastic band.

A piece of window screen can prevent the loss of any parts.

Dirt and dust can be damaging. They may attract insect pests, can be aesthetically disfiguring, or obscure important information, and can even cause physical harm by, for example, microscopically tearing fragile threads on an old textile.

The most important thing we remember is to remove as much dirt and dust as possible, without harming the object.

A Museum of a Museum

I recently attended the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Ecology and Evolution in Banff, Alberta. However, being stuck inside a building on several beautiful sunny days was agonizing and on several occasions I found myself gazing wistfully out the windows at the mountains beyond. Fortunately, visiting other museums while I travel is an important part of my job as it helps me to plan exhibits here at the Manitoba Museum. This trip was no exception and I was able to visit the Banff Park Museum during a long lunch break one day.

A multi storey wooden building. The main floor consists of primarily windows under an awning stretching the perimeter of the building. Wooden benches are placed periodically under the windows.

The Banff Park Museum in Alberta.

A smiling individual posing beside a display case containing a variety of taxidermized birds.

Next to a case of very old birds.

The Banff Park Museum is such an old museum (1903) that the building and its collection were protected as a National Historic Site in 1985. So basically it is a museum of what old museums used to look like. Apparently in the late 1950’s some people in the community wanted the Museum torn down and replaced with a new building and more modern exhibits. Looking around at the beautifully crafted wooden cases, hundred-year old specimens and gorgeous Douglas Fir wood panelling on the ceilings, I was thankful that cooler heads prevailed.

The Museum contains numerous “cabinets of curiosity”, as they used to be called. These cabinets contain more than 5,000 mounted birds, mammals, insects, plants and eggs collected in western Canada mainly between 1890 and 1930. Some of the “newer” exhibits created in 1914, displayed animals in their habitat, an approach that was considered radical at the time. Eventually this approach evolved into our modern-day dioramas. Nowadays some Museums are tearing down their dioramas and putting in “cabinets of curiosities” again, albeit with a modern twist. So I guess that “what goes around comes around” even in Museum design. I myself tend to think that what is most desirable is a mixture of the best of both, especially when many dioramas themselves have become worthy of preservation.

A taxidermized bison and calves in a large squared display case, with a prairie groundscape set up.

A “radical” new diorama circa 1914.

A wooden door with a large window in the front. Printed on the door is "Office / Curator of Museum". A white sign hangs in the window - unintelligible due to image quality.

The Curator left and never came back.

The Banff Park Museum is a museum of a museum in yet another way-there has not been a Curator there since 1932 when the last one retired. What this means is that the collection has effectively “died”. Curators keep collections alive through research, promotion and interpretation. Collections that cease to grow cannot incorporate new, valuable information about genetic, population and ecosystem changes over time. Without this information, our societal ability to make wise decisions about resource use is hindered. Curators ensure that information from the collections is accurate and promote collections use by anyone who needs it, such as scientists, managers, and government employees. Curators are also able to interpret the collection in the context of our current society. Unfortunately the important supporting role that collections play in science is rarely understood or appreciated, even by some scientists.

 

Image: An orchid on display at the Museum.

I was reading the job description of the ideal Curator in the Museum’s interpretive brochure. Professor John Macoun suggested in an 1895 correspondence that the ideal Curator should possess the following qualifications:

  • “A man of wide intelligence;
  • Energetic (not a hotel lounger);
  • Ought to be able to skin a bird or mammal;
  • Will talk natural history, mineralogy, geology or anything else to the visitor, and
  • A political bloke should be the last man for that place.”
A museum display case featuring a number of insect specimens.

What’s amusing is that a natural history Curators’ job description hasn’t really changed in a hundred years! You still need to be energetic to conduct field work and collect specimens. You still need to know how to prepare specimens for preservation. You still have to have a broad interest in natural history and the ability to communicate with visitors. And we are most definitely NOT “political blokes”. Really the only thing that has changed is the technology that modern Curators employ. I use a palm pilot to record my field notes instead of a notebook, a GPS to navigate instead of a map and compass, and a blog page to “talk natural history” with the visitor. It seems that “the more things change the more they stay the same”.

 

Image: Museum display of pinned insects.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Amethyst Update

The amethyst exhibit in the foyer was installed today, on schedule. There were a few teething pains, mostly related to lighting, but when you have done many exhibits you know that you will never be finished without some sort of issue.

The last 5% of the installation work always takes 50% of the time. As a public space, the foyer has a lot of ambient light, which means that there is an immense amount of reflection on a plexiglass case lid. When we put the lid on, we realized that we would not be able to read some of the text. So the lid came off, the backing panel was offset a bit to the side, some flat black board was placed inside the back of the lid, and the lights were moved around and adjusted a couple of times more.

A large amethyst in a plexiglass display case in front of a large information panel.

A large amethyst in a plexiglass display case in front of a large information panel.

Voilà, the exhibit is done, and we are very pleased with the result. MANY thanks to David, Hanna, Janis, Cindi, Adèle, Bob, Bert, Paul, Sean, and everyone else for their efforts.  Even a simple exhibit such as this one requires the work of many people!

Taxonomists: The Curious George’s of Science

At the heart of every taxonomist is a curious little monkey who just can’t stop exploring the world around him or her, sometimes to their detriment. I was reading a great book called “The Plant Hunters” by Tyler Whittle and was amazed at the trials and tribulations that early botanists like William Dampier (1651-1715), Philibert Commerson (1727-1773), and David Douglas (1799-1834) went through. Curiosity drove them to explore the remote areas of the world under extremely difficult circumstances in the hopes of finding plant species unknown to Western scientists. Many of the specimens that these men collected can still be found in European herbaria, providing us with a valuable snapshot of the past.

A path through a wooded area.

What exciting plants and fungi are lurking along this trail?

Four pieces of dried mouldy vegetation.

It took me quite a while to determine that this strange thing was a slime mold!

How about you?  Have you ever seen a mysterious plant or fungus that you just couldn’t identify?  If you were in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, eastern Alberta or northern Ontario, I may be able to help you, or if not, I can put you in touch with someone who can.  I can identify some plants and fungi from good photographs but it is usually preferable to have the actual specimen.  Most plants and fungi can be collected without killing them as long as the root system is left intact; orchids are the exception as they typically have only one stem and are sensitive to disturbance.  The Native Orchid Conservation Inc. has a great field guide called “Orchids of Manitoba” if you are interested in identifying these plants.

 

Image: A plant fresh out of the press.

If you wish to bring a specimen in to the Museum for identification, please call first to make an appointment as I am often in the field over the summer. Vascular plants and mosses can be brought fresh in a plastic bag with some moist paper towel inside, or pressed and dried between two sheets of newspaper. If you don’t have a plant press, you can use several large books to weigh it down. Try to collect specimens with leaves and flowers or fruits as you need both to identify some species.

A white mostly circular mushroom spore on a  black background.

A beautiful spore print on black paper.

A fresh mushroom specimen, with several caps growing out of a plant with a shared base.

Photographing the fungus while fresh with a ruler can aid greatly in identification.

If you wish to bring in a fungus, it should be kept in a paper bag as plastic will make it go slimy. As some mushrooms get eaten by maggots quickly, they need to be brought in soon after picking or dried using a fan, dehydrator, silica gel dessicant or a warm (140°F/60°C) oven. Since dried mushrooms change colour quite drastically and shrink in size, photographs and measurements of the cap and stem are useful. A spore print, made by laying a mushroom cap over a piece of paper and covering it with a glass or bowl for a few hours, is also useful for mushroom identification. Happy hunting!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson