Geology of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights: Part 1

Geology of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights: Part 1

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

A large irregularly shaped building that is almost shaped like an upward growing spiral building to a central tower. The left side is a light tan stone and the right side is predominantly windows.

The construction of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (CMHR) in Winnipeg has been the subject of tremendous public interest and media coverage. As opening nears for this institution, our first national museum outside the Ottawa area, I have read discussions of the planned exhibits and galleries, conversations concerning the relationship between the museum and local communities, and assessments of the architecture of the spectacular building. I have not, however, seen anything on a topic that may be of great interest to this page’s visitors: is the Canadian Museum for Human Rights worth looking at for its geological features?

 

Image: Construction site at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, June, 2013.

Having received a tour of the interior construction site in April, followed up more recently by careful examination of the building’s exterior, I have to respond to this question with a full-voiced “yes.” The CMHR does not contain as great a variety of building stones as some older buildings in downtown Winnipeg, but some of the materials are of types not readily seen in other structures, and the immense scale of the structure permits a geological experience that may be unparalleled elsewhere in this town.

The following descriptions are based largely on my brief observations of a building still very much under construction, along with what I could glean from the web and some information received from helpful staff at CMHR. Since a thorough examination is not possible at this stage, and since surfaces were still being installed when I saw them, it is entirely probable that I have missed or misinterpreted some of the geological materials. I am also, for the moment, ignoring the site geology and materials other than stone. At some point in the future I hope that we can write a detailed consideration of CMHR’s geology, comparable to our work on the Manitoba Legislative Building (a pdf can be found here).

A large irregularly shaped building that is almost shaped like an upward growing spiral building to a central tower. This side of the building is primarily windows. In front of the building are piles of gravel and stone, as the site is under construction.

Outside the museum, stone is being installed to integrate the building with the surrounding landscape.

Looking up at the angular side of a stone building topped with a metal and windowed tower.

On the building’s exterior, Tyndall Stone walls appear as a stack of irregular polygons.

To a Winnipegger walking outside the CMHR, the immense surfaces of Manitoba Tyndall Stone are both familiar and obvious. Since this stone is locally ubiquitous, I will instead begin with the more unusual materials in the museum’s interior. As you enter the building, some of the introductory areas seem dark and low, walled largely with ochre-coloured concrete along with feature walls of other materials. Passing upward into more open spaces, you have your first glance of the extensive ramp system that allows visitors to walk through the many museum areas.

Looking up at crisscrossing silverish coloured stone ramps.

Standing in a corner of a ramp that goes lower to the left and rises to the right. Individuals in high-vis vests and hard hats are further up on the right-side ramp.

Looking up at crisscrossing silverish coloured stone ramps.

1. Spanish Alabaster

The walking surfaces of the ramps are concrete, but the sides are Spanish alabaster, quarried in Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain. Alabaster is a translucent, lustrous stone, long used by humans because it is beautiful and easy to work with. The CMHR alabaster is cut quite thin, about 2 cm (or 3/4″), and with the natural light it glows magically when backlit.

Geologically, two major types of material are considered as “alabasters”: gypsum (hydrous sulfate of calcium) and calcite (calcium carbonate). Neither kind of alabaster is resistant to rain and moisture, so both are only suitable for indoor use. The CMHR alabaster is of the gypsum sort; it is quite a soft material, but the crystals are tiny and tightly bound together, permitting both the polish and the translucent quality. Pure alabaster is white, and the beautiful colours and patterns actually come from impurities such as clays.

Sunlight shining through the opaque side of an alabaster ramp.

Translucent alabaster on the side of a ramp.

A stone room with a ramp crossing the centre. The room is under construction with carious tools and equipment on the main floor.

These views of ramps show the beautiful variation in tone and colour of alabaster.

The incomplete end of a large alabaster ramp with a barricade at the end as it is still under construction.

The Aragonese alabaster was quarried from near-horizontal beds in the Ebro Basin of northeastern Spain. It formed during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs (roughly 34 to 5 million years ago). During this interval, the Ebro Basin was endorheic (i.e., it had internal drainage and was not connected to the sea). As a result the water often became very saline (briny), and salts were precipitated out to form bedded chemical rock, most notably the gypsum that makes up this alabaster. The Aragonese alabaster is quarried by Alabaster New Concept.

Manitoba also has considerable gypsum deposits in our Jurassic sedimentary rocks. These can be seen at places such as Gypsumville and Amaranth, but as far as I know there is none of alabaster grade.

________________________________

Part 2 of this geological tour will follow soon, with an explanation of the dark stone that can be seen in the spectacular Garden of Contemplation and other places in the museum’s interior.

Winnipeg Tribune Head is Found

A large terra cotta face, with a hand beside it in the lower left corner for scale.

Some time ago, after the donation of a “gargoyle” that once graced the former Winnipeg Tribune Building, we put out a call to the public to see if any more of these strange terra cotta statues would show up (see my blog of March 30, 2012). Fourteen are known to have existed, and The Manitoba Museum had two. We did get some calls, with two leads to something I had not expected: giant grotesque heads that adorned the exterior of the building at the top of the first storey – (the gargoyles were soaring at 6 storeys). I checked out the original architectural plans at the Archives of Manitoba, and it turns out there were fourteen of these heads as well!

It’s believed that this head might represent a newspaper boy.

 

Image: Terra cotta “grotesque” from the Winnipeg Tribune Building, 1913.

I also mentioned in my previous blog that I was trying to identify the original artist. Well, I found out that all the grotesques were made at the American Terra Cotta and Ceramic Company factory near Chicago, Illinois. The artist may have been Kristian E. Schneider, a Norwegian immigrant who worked with American Terra Cotta from about 1906 to 1930. He was their lead sculptor and modeller and had early in his career worked very closely with Louis Sullivan, the famous architect of the “Chicago School”. Sullivan was instrumental in the development of the steel beam skyscraper, and his work also influenced the architect of the Winnipeg Tribune Building, John D.Atchison, who commissioned the grotesques. It seems that for a brief time at least, Winnipeg really was a Chicago of the North.

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Curator of History

Roland Sawatzky joined The Manitoba Museum in 2011. He received his B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Winnipeg, M.A. in Anthropology from the University of South Carolina, and Ph.D. in Archaeology…
Meet Dr. Roland Sawatzky

The Scientific Method: A Reality Check

If you have ever heard someone say “I have a theory about that” they don’t. They’re most likely confusing the word “theory” with “completely unsupported, untested hypothesis”. All kidding aside, the words “theory” and “hypothesis” mean something very specific to a scientist, and the former is actually a much stronger statement than the latter. Since most people are not scientists but sometimes need to judge the value of someone’s statements, it can be useful to have at least a rudimentary understanding of how the scientific process works.

The journey to creating a theory is a long and arduous one and, in fact, one that most scientists will only ever contribute peripherally to. But every journey starts with a first step so that is where we will begin. In addition to the scientific jargon, I have taken the liberty of translating it into everyday vernacu… umm, language (it’s hard to stop using big words when you’ve spent 22 years in school).

A cluster of small white flowers with yellow centres, which a bumble bee on the top.

Step 1

Select a topic for study.
Translation: Read so many scientific journals that your eyeballs dry up and your head explodes.

Step 2

Contemplate.
Translation: Think really hard about what you’ve read. Unfortunately thinking looks a lot like slacking off. So keep a file open on your computer and sit in front of it while you’re thinking in case someone walks by. That way it looks like you’re working. Which you are of course, it just doesn’t look like it!

Step 3

State your hypothesis and the opposite of it, which will be the null hypothesis.
Translation: Make an educated guess regarding what will happen.  Or not.

 

Image: Watching bumblebees made me wonder why they visited certain flowers more than others.

A patch of ground with tufty, wild growing grass. On the far side are some folding chairs and a bush with reddish tinged leaves.

Step 4

Design an experiment to test your hypotheses.
Translation: Create a beautifully designed experiment that will win you awards and accolades from your peers!  Fantasize about winning a Nobel prize.

Step 5

Conduct the experiment and collect data.
Translation: Discover that nature really doesn’t like beautifully designed experiments and will vindictively do everything it can (late frosts, hail, floods etc.) to screw with your research so that you have to change everything on the fly just to get some publishable results!

 

Image: A research plot in Spruce Woods Provincial Park, MB.

A hand reaches into frame holding a tuft next to a small cluster of purple flowers.

Step 6

Analyze the data.
Translation: Create so many spreadsheets and conduct so many statistical tests that you can no longer find anything on your computer.

Step 7

Determine which hypothesis was correct and why.
Translation: Shout “eureka” if your hypothesis is correct or “oh nuts”, when it isn’t. If you said “oh nuts” double check your data and analytical techniques just in case you made a mistake. Discover that you didn’t make a mistake. Say “oh nuts!” again. Conduct another literature search to try to figure out why the null hypothesis was correct instead of the hypothesis.

 

Image: I conducted a hand pollination experiment on a rare plant.

Step 8

Write a paper for a peer reviewed journal.
Translation: Spend several months preparing a paper and ensuring that the formatting meets the requirements of the most prestigious journal in your field. Submit. Receive rejection letter. Reformat your paper for a less prestigious journal and submit. Receive scathing peer reviews of your paper. Swear. Reluctantly make suggested changes to the paper while grumbling about it to anyone that will listen. Even more reluctantly conclude that the reviewers’ changes do indeed greatly improve your paper. Submit final version. Send a reprint to your mother.

 

Although I was intentionally being silly, the fact of the matter is that a research project never goes off without a hitch.   Science is certainly one thing: a learning experience.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Open Air Museums in Poland

I was recently asked to attend a conference and weekend festival in Poland regarding historic landscapes in the Vistula River valley. One of the newer public interests in the area happens to be Mennonite history: Mennonites arrived in Poland in the mid-16th century from the Netherlands region and established thriving communities that existed until 1945, when they fled the Soviet advances at the end of World War II.

A large building with a thatched roof. The second storey extends from the centre of the lower storey creating a sheltered overhang.

One of my research interests is Mennonite domestic architecture. I was taken to a house built in 1770 in the village of Chrystkowo (formerly Christefelde) . Two things surprised me: how similar the arrangement of rooms was to Mennonite housebarns I had seen in Manitoba (all built after 1874); and how gigantic these homes could be! Although I had studied Mennonite architecture in Poland on paper, there’s nothing like seeing it in person. After all, that’s why museums are so great – they allow us to see the real objects of history, whose very existence takes us to another level of experience.

 

Image: 1770 Chrystkowo housebarn.

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Dr. Roland Sawatzky

Curator of History

Roland Sawatzky joined The Manitoba Museum in 2011. He received his B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Winnipeg, M.A. in Anthropology from the University of South Carolina, and Ph.D. in Archaeology…
Meet Dr. Roland Sawatzky

The Value of Professional Conferences

By Kathy Nanowin, past Manager of Conservation

 

I went to the annual conference of the Canadian Association for Conservation (CAC) this year, as I try to do every year. It is held in late spring in a different location in Canada, alternating between different regions of the country. It is not a large conference, with attendance ranging from 70 or so in the smaller cities, to about 150 or even 200 in larger cities such as Toronto. This is because there are not a huge number of conservators in Canada; we are quite a small profession.

Why do professional associations, or any group for that matter, hold conferences? Aren’t they just an excuse to travel somewhere exotic on the corporate or government dime, and drink wine?

The exterior of a large red historic house with white trim.

Historic house in Saint John, New Brunswick, where I attended a conference.

Interior room in a historic house with people seated around tables laid around the room.

The conference banquet was also in a historic building, the Union Club.

Well, no. Conservators have been compared to doctors; the way we care for objects has many similarities to the way doctors care for people. We “operate” (perform treatments) on objects to repair damage that has been done. We also spend a lot of time advising on preventive measures that will keep objects “healthy”; as in human health, prevention is the most important consideration, to prevent or mitigate damage or deterioration. There are also, as in medicine, many scientists working with practitioners (the conservators) to identify needed areas of research, to add to the body of knowledge in our areas of work. New information is always being discovered, as in medicine. That is why we have professional journals, and why we hold conferences.

I’ve been to many conferences over the years I’ve been a conservator. I find that I always learn something, and I always come back to work rejuvenated, with my enthusiasm for my job renewed. Working in cultural heritage in Canada can make one feel fairly isolated. I don’t have that much contact with the general public; I work in a medium-size museum, so I have a lot of museum colleagues, but not that many fellow conservators to talk to. There just aren’t that many of us.

Going to a different Canadian city every year, getting to see different museums, with their great collections, but also challenging situations, is wonderful. However, the best thing about going to professional conferences, for me, is the face to face contact with people. I can read someone’s article in a journal, but to talk to them in person just can’t be replaced. I learn about new conservation treatments, the latest research, shared problems, and the overall mood of the profession. I catch the giant enthusiasm of new graduates.

I personally am able to pay to attend CAC conferences out of my pocket, but I also try to support the attendance of another conservator from the Museum out of departmental budgets, with grant assistance, whenever possible. This is because I firmly believe in the value of professional development, and especially the value of professional conferences.

Celebrating Indigenous Heritage

By Kevin Brownlee, past Curator of Archaeology

 

June 21 is the Summer Solstice and also is the New Year for the Rocky Cree and many other First Nation groups. This day is now recognized as the National Aboriginal Day, celebrating First Nations, Metis and Inuit culture and heritage. To mark this event a huge celebration was held at the Forks in downtown Winnipeg and The Manitoba Museum was one of the exhibitors.

I was pleased to participate that day, honouring my heritage and my ancestors by paddling a 15 foot birch bark canoe down the Assiniboine River to the Forks. For thousands of years my ancestors have paddled the lakes and rivers of this beautiful land; being in the canoe connects me to this past.

My wife Myra and I paddled together and we were welcomed at the Forks by many onlookers, our family and daughter Meghan.

A couple with their arms around each other wearing life jackets standing on a bank next to a canoe in a river.

Getting ready for the paddle.

Two individual seated either end of a canoe, each using paddles to push off from a river bank.

The send off.

A couple standing together holding a toddler as they all stand in front of a canoe raised on saw horses until a canopy.

Kevin, Myra and Meghan at The Manitoba Museum tent with canoe.

Blitzing the Day Away

Last week I went blitzing-BIOblitzing that is. What, you may ask is a BioBlitz? BioBlitz’s are biological surveys that are periodically held by conservation organizations or universities to identify the species of plants, animals and fungi that inhabit a particular tract of land. In Manitoba, the Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) periodically holds BioBlitz’s to identify the species on new properties that it acquires. The BioBlitz that I just participated in was of NCC’s recently acquired Fort Ellice property near the Saskatchewan border, just south of St. Lazare.

Having never been on a BioBlitz before, I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect. It turned out to be two days of hiking along the lovely Assiniboine River Valley, visiting with biologists I hadn’t seen for quite a while and seeing some beautiful rare plants, insects, and birds. It also meant getting covered in ticks and a boot-full of muddy swamp water but those are the normal hazards of field work.

A brown and white Sphinx moth with triangular wings perched among blades of grass.

Newly hatched Sphinx Moth.

Rolling sand dunes with sparse green vegetation growing along them.

Sand dunes along Beaver Creek.

Close up on a small blue flower with a pocket-like centre.

Smooth Blue Beardtongue-a rare Manitoba plant.

Doing a survey with a large group of botanists made the event much more effective because if one of us didn’t know what a plant species was, someone else did. It was as if we had formed one big, really smart superbotanist! In addition to the plant people, there were also birders, a range manager, ecologists, bug catchers, a mammal expert, a couple of fungus guys, and even an archaeologist. We recorded all of the species we saw, and any plant, lichen, or fungus we couldn’t identify was collected to examine in the lab.

Highlights of the trip included spectacular sand dunes, a babbling brook, a recently hatched Sphinx Moth, mating Tiger Moths, and one of the largest morels I’ve ever seen. Now comes the sad part: waiting for the next BioBlitz so I can do it all over again!

A creek next to a rolling green hill.

Beaver Creek early in the morning.

An oblong mushroom with a warm-yellow upper and white root.

A very large (20 cm long) Yellow Morel.

Two white moths on a green leaf.

Tiger moths getting friendly!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Greening Your Garden

Many people love to garden. But the way you garden can have a negative impact on the environment or a positive one. “Green” gardens are cheaper to maintain as they do not require high inputs of water, fertilizers, pesticides, or fossil fuels, and provide habitat for the many wild plants and animals that share our planet. Here are some tips to increase how “green” your garden is.

Close up on a branch of white blossoms on an American Plum tree.
  • Water your lawn infrequently or not at all. Frequent, light watering encourages grass to develop shallow roots, making it more vulnerable to drought than a lawn watered only occasionally but deeply.
  • Thatch build up occurs when you overwater and over-fertilize your lawn; the abundant grass clippings that are generated cannot be decomposed by the soil organisms quickly enough. If you stop fertilizing and watering your lawn, your thatch problems will also disappear. Plus you won’t have to mow as often.
  • Consider buying a push mower. The new push mowers are light and just as easy to push as a gas or electric mower. They also cost less to run, emit no greenhouse gases and are quiet, helping prevent Saturday afternoon noise pollution. Your lawn clippings will fall on the grass and fertilize new growth, reducing your need for chemical fertilizers.

 

Image: Small trees like this American Plum provide food for spring pollinators and edible fruits for you!

  • Consider replacing some of the lawn you don’t use with trees, shrubs and/or flowers as they provide better habitat for beneficial insect and birds.
  • Correct placement of trees and shrubs can also improve the energy efficiency of your home. Evergreens planted on the north side of your house block cold north winds while deciduous trees on the south side let the sun warm your home in winter but block it in the summer when it’s hot.
  • Don’t even try to grow grass in dense shade. Cover with mulch or plant hardy, attractive, native ground covers like Western Canada Violet or Canada Anemone.

A small bushy plant with small white flowers.

Western Canada Violet makes a great ground cover for shady areas.

An orange butterfly perched on a frilly purple flower.

Butterflies love Wild Bergamot.

A frilly blue-purple flower with a bumble bee on the centre.

The exotic Bachelor’s Buttons attracts pollinators like bees.

  • Grow at least some native plants in your yard. Native plants are adapted for the climatic conditions that we get in Manitoba, requiring no fertilizers or supplemental watering when grown in the proper spot. Native plants provide food for many birds and beneficial insects like bees and hoverflies.
  • If you like to grow exotic plants, include some that provide food for birds and/or insects. Many horticultural species like hydrangeas, peonies, begonias and fancy “double flowers” are not very attractive to our native pollinators. Exotic plants that do provide food for pollinators include: columbine, delphinium, globe thistle, mint, oregano, Goat’s-beard, and many more.
  • Add some features, such as bird baths, butterfly salt licks, or nesting boxes, to your yard to make it more attractive to wildlife.
  • Use organic or “hands on” methods to control pests. More pesticides per hectare are used on people’s gardens than on cropland. We often forget that insecticides kill more than just crop pests-they also kill the beneficial pollinators that we depend on to produce much of our food. Neonicotinoids appear to be particularly harmful to bees (read more). Children and pets are also more vulnerable to the dangers that these chemicals pose.
  • Compost your kitchen scraps and yard waste (i.e. leaves, grass clippings, dead plants) to obtain cheap, organic garden fertilizer. Artificial fertilizers require lots of fossil fuel energy to produce and, when used incorrectly and excessively, contribute to the pollution of local lakes and rivers. Use the compost in your vegetable garden, flower beds, or sprinkled evenly over your lawn.

 

Image: Asters provide colour in your garden in the fall and are popular with bees and butterflies.

  • Remember to put your yard waste  out for collection along with your recyclables and garbage if you live in Winnipeg.
  • For more information on green gardening pick up the “Naturescape Manitoba” book published by the Manitoba Naturalists Society (Nature Manitoba).
Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Pollen, Predators, and Parasites

Last summer I went to Spruce Woods Provincial Park to determine which insects pollinate the rare Hairy Prairie-clover plant, a species that only occurs in sand dunes. Oddly enough, even though Hairy Prairie-clover is rare, it was being visited more frequently than some of the common plants I have observed. But there was a dark side to all that activity: it was drenched in blood-the blood of innocents! Instead of the cute, fuzzy little bumblebees I had grown accustomed to watching, I encountered big, black and yellow or red wasps and large, colourful wasp-like flies! What were those crazy creatures? When I got my insect identifications back recently, I was shocked to discover that 40% of the species and 67% of the insect visits to Hairy Prairie-clover were by solitary hunting wasps and parasitic flies that prey on other insects.

The Sand Wasp (Bembix pruinosa) was the most frequent flower visitor to Hairy Prairie-clover. Although adult Sand Wasps consume pollen and nectar, the females also capture and paralyze small flies (e.g. Soldier and Horse Flies) to feed to their babies. The Sand Wasp larvae and paralyzed prey are well hidden in underground burrows. A related species of wasp called a “bee-wolf” (Philanthus sp.) was observed capturing and flying away with tiny Andrenid Bees (Perdita perpallida) that were busy pollinating Hairy Prairie-clover.

A small black and yellow striped wasp on a purple bulb-like flower.

Sand Wasp on Hairy Prairie-clover.

A very small pale green insect on the underside of a purple bulb-like flower.

A small Sweat Bee unaware of the fact that it is about to become a wasp’s breakfast.

The Common Thread-waisted Wasp (Ammophila procera) is also a solitary hunting wasp but captures the caterpillars of Noctuid moths called Prominents (Notodontidae) instead of flies. A similar looking species, the Great Black Wasp (Sphex pensylvanicus), captures and paralyzes grasshopper or katydid larvae, and lays an egg on it to act as baby food. The Grasshopper Bee Fly (Systoechus vulgaris) also parasitizes grasshopper eggs. The female Grasshopper Bee Fly shoots her eggs in an area of loose soil suspected to contain grasshopper eggs. The hatched larvae crawl around in the soil until they find a suitable grasshopper host and then they suck it dry!

Similarly, the larvae of large Scoliid Wasps (Trielis octomaculata), are ectoparasites on Scarab Beetle (Scarabaeidae) larvae. The large females hunt down the beetle larvae in the soil, paralyze them and lay an egg on them. Some Scoliid wasps have even been used for the biocontrol of white grubs on sugar cane crops.

A green insect with a leaf-like appearance and long antennae sits on an oblong purple flower.

Katydid resting on Hairy Prairie-clover; another unsuspecting victim!

A large black and yellow wasp on a purple oblong flower.

The predatory Scoliid Wasp enjoying some pollen!

A patch of sand with a number of small holes, burrow entrances, along it.

Many wasps have their burrows in loose sand on the dunes.

And those wasp-like flies? They were Conopid or Thick-headed Flies. The female flies lay their eggs inside bees or wasps. The hatched larva then slowly eats its host until it dies, eventually bursting from the exoskeleton after pupation.

Ironically, even the parasitic wasps are themselves parasitized. The females of the Bee Fly Exoprosopa shoot their eggs into the burrows of solitary hunting wasps, and the hatched larvae develop as external parasitoids. What a fascinating series of biological interactions surrounding just a single plant. Clearly it’s an insect-eat-insect-eat-insect-eat-plant world out there!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Three Days in the Interlake

By Dr. Graham Young, past Curator of Palaeontology & Geology

 

Looking through my window at the still-snowy, still-wintry Winnipeg streetscape, I have to remind myself that spring is not far away. Soon the snow will leave and we will again be able to begin one of the most pleasurable of the Museum’s activities: fieldwork. Last year, between various other projects, I worked with Bob Elias (University of Manitoba) and Ed Dobrzanski on gathering information that we could use in a field guidebook for this spring’s Winnipeg GAC-MAC meeting (Geological Association of Canada – Mineralogical Association of Canada).

Two individuals walking down a path of trimmed autumn vegetation. Bare trees and evergreens lined the path.

Most of the sites we planned to include in the guidebook were well known to us, but there was one glaring absence: Bob and I had never seen the type section for the Lower Silurian Fisher Branch Formation, and Ed had visited it just once almost 50 years ago! From the published scientific work we knew where the site should be: all we had to do was to visit and document it. This seemed like a straightforward mission, as we already had maps and a geographic position, but as it turned out we made three trips to the Fisher Branch area before the work was complete.

 

Image: Tramping through the woods in October.

The first trip, in late May, was after several days of rain. We found the right roads, we located the property on which the site should be located, and we met and received help from the very kind owners of the property. But the roads were continuous mud in places, and we were told that the field track to the site would be impassable that day. We would need to come back later when the weather had been dry for a while.

Two individuals standing on a rough gravel path next to a grassy space and some green-leaved trees. Ons of the individuals is holding and examining a handheld device.

On the first day out, Ed gathers GPS data from a little patch of bedrock outcrop some distance from the actual locality, while it appears that Bob is not really enjoying the misty weather.

Two individuals getting into a car on the same side. The car is very dirty and dusty, and on a road worn into a grassy-stretch. A dog approaches from in front of the car.

No, the collie did not chase us into the car. It was extremely friendly, and just wanted us to hang around longer!

An individual standing in front of a shoulder high fence. On the other wise is a herd of cows staring towards the individual.

Bob demonstrates “cow-whispering” skills of which Ed and I had been previously unaware. Bob says later that they were more attentive than his human classes often are, though their attention did not seem to last very long.

A very dirty, dusty car parked next to a field with a large Canada goose statue.

This is what the car looked like after we had finished many miles on muddy roads. Ed and Bob are inside, but you can’t really see them through the nearly-opaque windows. That’s the Lundar Goose in the background.

The second day was one of those hot, dry, breezy July days. The air motion was sufficient to cool us and to keep mosquitoes and flies from being too much of a nuisance. We drove through fields almost to the site, without even getting dirt on the car! Tucking trousers into socks to keep the nasty wood ticks from climbing our legs (this may look goofy, but it works), we pushed through the dense brush. We rapidly discovered four nice scarp sections in the trees. The farthest of these looked promising because it showed the best exposure of the Stonewall Formation, which lies under the Fisher Branch. This site, however, turned out to be already occupied: a bear grunted and huffed from the underlying crevice when we got too close!

We quickly decided to measure the next section along instead. Data and rock samples were easily gathered, but we could not get decent photos of the rocks because the view was blocked by foliage whichever way we turned. We would need to return in the autumn, after the trees had lost their leaves.

Two individuals near a red car parked in wild grass in front of a dense tree line.

In the perfect July weather, Bob (right) and I unload gear at the edge of the field. (photo by Ed Dobrzanski)

Two individuals on the top of a rocky outcropping in a treed area. Both are wearing their pants tucked into their long socks.

Success! Bob and Ed on top of a bedrock scarp.

An orange and black butterfly on a small yellow flower.

A small green fern popping up to the sunlight from between two rocks.

A small orange wood tick on a opaque material.

A wood tick that, thanks to the “pants tucked into socks” approach, was discovered on the outside of my clothing.

By mid October the leaves were all gone and the weather was still lovely; ideal for our final “day out” near Fisher Branch. We stopped at Stony Mountain and Stonewall to check out conditions at those localities, then drove north to Fisher Branch by lunchtime. In the field beside the sites we were met by a large herd of cows (perhaps the Interlake should be advertised as “Land of Cows”?), some of which became very interested in our Jeep. The bear was apparently no longer in residence at the farthest scarp, so we were free to examine the rock, take photographs, and gather a set of isotope samples. Later in the afternoon, we tramped up over the hill above the scarp, just to make sure that there was no further unexamined outcrop.

It was a perfect autumn day; the last perfect field day of the year, as it turned out. Our drive to Grand Rapids under rather less pleasant conditions was to follow just a couple of days later.

A light-coloured Jeep parked in a field. A cow appears to be licking the side of the vehicle as two others stand nearby.

It is good that Jeeps are designed to take a licking.

A rock wall with moss and lichen growing along the top. In the centre a tape measure hangs from a ridge, extending the length of the centre third of the wall.

The body of the tape measure rests at the boundary between the Stonewall Formation (below) and Fisher Branch Formation (above). That boundary is now considered to also represent the Ordovician-Silurian Boundary, so this site is very significant as the only place this systemic boundary can be observed in southern Manitoba. Length of the tape measure is 1 metre.

Close-up on some lichens growing on bark.

An old farm building with a folding chair and metal washbasin outside next to a window with peeling orange trim and drawn curtains on the other side of the fogged glass.

The farm includes several wonderful buildings from the original Ukrainian settlement of this area, about a century ago.

Close-up on the window in the previous image. On the exterior of the old wooden walls hangs a metal washbasin. The window trim is orange and peeling. Inside some clutter is up against he window glass, seen between the drawn curtains.

An old farm building with a metal roof and wooden walls and doors. On of the two double doors is open, revealing overgrown grass creeping inside.