Ancient pottery making described in new Anishinaabemowin translation

Ancient pottery making described in new Anishinaabemowin translation

By Maureen Matthews, past Curator of Anthropology

 

Jacob Owen of Pauingassi was always cheerfully willing to explain the complexities of Ojibwe history and philosophy with stories from his own life. Margaret Simmons, who conducted this interview, was the Director of Education in Pauingassi at the time. She is a warm and open person with a positive genius for respectfully conversing with old people and her unique talent made my visits to Pauingassi and over 300 hours of Anishinaabe language recordings possible. The equally brilliant and even more patient Anishinaabe linguist, Roger Roulette, has been gradually transcribing and translating the Pauingassi recordings. He just finished this one today and it contains a remarkable discussion in Anishinaabemowin about the old Anishinaabe and their skill at making pots out of clay.

A black and white portrait of a seated older man from the side, smiling and laughing behind his hand.

Jacob was over 90 at the time of the interview, the oldest man in the community. He spoke very little English and had lived his whole life in Pauingassi. He most definitely had not read scholarly reports about archaeological discoveries of 500 year old clay pots made by his ancestors and yet, here he is, talking about how incredibly skillful his ancestors were at making these beautifully decorated pots. The conversation veers off after this, in part because Margaret, a very good modern speaker, doesn’t know the word for “clay, waabigan” but this short quote from Jacob’s conversation is an indication of the extent to which one can rely on First Nations oral historical accounts for the truth about the distant past. By the way, Roger says that the verb to fire a pot is zakizo (va) to burn an animate thing. The idea of a kiln is expressed in the verb boodawaash (ca) which means to superheat something animate.

 

Image: Jacob Owen, Pauingassi Manitoba. 1996.

Original (Anishinaabemowin)Translation (English)
JO: Daabishkoo, gigikendaan ina ‘iwe gaa-ijigaadeg, aadizookaanag gaa-ijigaadeg?JO: It’s like…you know what they mean by that, what they mean by aadizookaanag (legendary heroes)?
MS: Eya’.MS: Yes.
JO: Daabishkoo mii gaa-inendaagoziwaad igiweniwag Anishinaabeg nishtam gaa-gii-bimi-ayaawaad. Bigo gegoon gaye ogii-ozhitoonaawaa’. Wiinawaa bigo.JO: The first Anishinaabeg that existed, this is what they’re comparable to (the legendary heroes). Also, they were able to make anything. They, themselves.
Nashke aya’aa, akik. Waabigan gaa-onji-ayaawaad. I’iya’aawan nda gii-onizhishiwag. Eji-, eji debakamig gidaa-ikid e-gii-mookaakizowaad. Ndawaaj gii-onizhishiwag.For instance, a pot (vessel) (noun animate). They made them from clay. My, they were beautiful. You would have said they were incredible. The visible images (on the pots), undoubtedly, they were beautiful.
MS: Aaniin dino akikwag? Asiniiwi-akikwag?MS: What kind of vessel? Stone vessels?
JO: Bibagiziwag. Gii-bibagiziwag. Waabigan daabishkoo. I’iwe dash waakaa-aya’ii gii-mazine’aawaad gaye, ndawaaj gii-onizhishiwag.JO: They’re thin. They were thin. It was the nature of clay. However, they had images/patterns around (the pot). My, but they were beautiful.
Zhigwa ayi’ii naanaagadawendamaan, awegodogwen gaa-omookomaaniwaad nishtam?Well, when I think about it, I wonder what they used for a knife (to incise the designs) at that time, at the outset?

200 Years Later: The Battle of Seven Oaks

Yesterday (June 19th) marked the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Seven Oaks, the boiling point of years of conflict (not always violent) between the Hudson’s Bay Company and North West Company in the Red River settlement region.

Like any historic event, isolating the details of June 19th, 1816 is a disservice to both parties involved, so I strongly encourage readers to take a look at the resources listed at the end of this post to get the context, and garner multiple perspectives on what happened.

Many scholars have debated what to call this event: battle; massacre; incident; skirmish. Joe Martin’s article on the Manitoba Historical Society’s website weighs in on this semantic discussion here. I noticed that popular media, like recent CBC articles, seem to use ‘battle’ so that’s what I’ve stuck with here.

I searched through the HBC Museum Collection to find an artifact connected to this event. The only thing related to it is this calendar print, produced by the HBC as a marketing tool to promote their retail activities and highlight the Company’s history. You can read up on the history of the HBC calendars on the HBC Heritage Services website.

A calendar page for January 1914. At the top is a painting of the Battle of Seven Oaks, showing two sides of the fight charging and shooting at one another. Below that is a monument and two flags - the Hudson's Bay Company flag and the North West Company flag.

The 1914 HBC Calendar shows the Battle of Seven Oaks, painted by Charles William Jefferys.

Close-up on a painting of the Battle of Seven Oaks, showing two sides of the fight charging and shooting at one another. Below that is a monument and two flags - the Hudson's Bay Company flag and the North West Company flag.

A closer look.

This painting, like all calendar paintings, was commissioned by the HBC. What’s depicted here is likely not how things played out at the time, but is a representation of how people (specifically the HBC) felt about the event nearly 100 years later. It’s interesting to compare this image to how we think about it today, 200 years later.

Online Resources

Canadian Encyclopedia: The Battle of Seven Oaks

Canada’s History: Selkirk Settlers, Cuthbert Grant & the Battle of Seven Oaks

Coutts, Robert and Stuart, Richard (eds.) The Forks and the Battle of Seven Oaks in Manitoba History, Manitoba Historical Society (1994).

Dick, Lyle (1991) “The Seven Oaks Incident and the Construction of a Historical Tradition, 1816 to 1970”, Journal of the Canadian Historical Association 2(1):91-113.  PDF available here.

Print Resources

Barkwell, Lawrence J. (2010) The Battle of Seven Oaks : a Métis perspective. Winnipeg : Louis Riel Institute.

Bumsted, J.M. (2008)  Lord Selkirk: a life. University of Manitoba Press.

Bumstead, J.M. (2003) Fur Trade Wars: The Founding of Western Canada.  Great Plains Publications.

Dr. Amelia Fay

Dr. Amelia Fay

Curator of Anthropology & the HBC Museum Collection

Amelia Fay is Curator of Anthropology and the HBC Museum Collection at the Manitoba Museum. She received her BA in Anthropology from the University of Manitoba (2004), an MA in Archaeology…
Meet Dr. Amelia Fay

Dirty Little Secrets

Whenever someone walks into the Conservation lab, they are usually awed at all the scientific equipment. Large wall cabinets filled with chemicals, adhesives, paints, glass beakers and flasks. There is safety equipment, such as fume hoods and spiralling exhaust vents hanging from the ceilings to ensure proper precautions are taken. With this complex system, it looks like conservators are risking their lives every day to preserve and protect cultural heritage. However, I am about to share with you one of our dirtiest cleaning secrets that we keep hidden behind these lab walls.

SALIVA. Yes, that is correct. At some point you’ve probably heard of the saying when cleaning something to give it the old “spit shine.” Although we don’t actually spit on our artifacts, nor do we lick anything, conservators do use their own saliva as one method to clean a number of different types of artifacts. The technique is relatively simple in that a cotton swab is hand rolled onto a wooden probe and lightly dampened by placing the swab into our mouth (generally pre-lunch).  The swab is then rolled onto the surface that we are cleaning to remove the desired residue. Tests are always done prior to a full cleaning to make sure that other soluble materials that we want to stay on the artifact don’t get swept away.

Now why this technique is used and how well does it really work? Human saliva is composed of amylase, which is a type of enzyme. Enzymes are used to break down particles depending on their make-up, so in the instance of amylase it helps humans to break down food particles. For conservators, amylase is also very useful in removing built-up grime and dirt that are found on artifacts. The benefit of using “enzymatic cleaning” (a more professional term for those completely grossed out) is that it is readily available, free, and does not require us to use large safety equipment such as fume hoods.

As mentioned, a range of artifacts can be cleaned using this technique, including leather, beading, oil paintings, and wooden surfaces. Now, I probably wouldn’t recommend trying this at home, as there may be an instance that something gets removed from your precious heirloom that you didn’t want to remove, but you are always welcome to contact a conservator here at the Manitoba Museum, who can advise you on the process first. In the images below, you will see a before and after picture of an oil painting that was recently cleaned using saliva. Happy cleaning!

 

Fort Garry, 1869
Signed L.-S (likely Lionel Stephenson)
Oil painting on artist’s board
H9-11-603

A painting with grime and wear across it. A winter scene showing an individual and several objects obscured by dirt in the snow in front of a stone fort.

Oil painting before treatment. © Manitoba Museum

An oil painting that shows some signs of age around the edges but is clean. A winter scene where an individual stands with a dog sled team in the snow in front of a large stone fort.

Oil painting after treatment using saliva cleaning technique. © Manitoba Museum

Carolyn Sirett

Carolyn Sirett

Conservator

Carolyn Sirett received her B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Manitoba, Diploma in Cultural Resource Management from the University of Victoria, and Diploma in Collections Conservation and Management…
Meet Carolyn Sirett

Gettin’ down at Yellow Quill Prairie

View out over the prairie landscape, with a light fence and sign in the lower right foreground.

Last week I started my field season by getting down on my hands and knees to collect plants and pollinators at the Yellow Quill Prairie Preserve, which is owned and managed by the Nature Conservancy of Canada. While that may not sound particularly appealing to you, it is something that I love about my job. After a long winter stuck inside, it is marvelous to spend some time out in nature appreciating the absence of city noise. When I arrived at the prairie, I was greeted by a sound that I absolutely adore: the call of a Western Meadowlark (hear it in this video). Nothing says “prairie” like a meadowlark!

 

Image: It was cool and rainy when I got to the Nature Conservancy’s Yellow Quill Prairie Preserve.

Unfortunately I was also greeted by something not so pleasant: rain and wind. Those two things in combination result in the dreaded sideways rain; you know the rain that hits you right in the face rather than landing on your hat. “Oh well,” I thought, “all I have to do on the first day is select my plots and I can do that in a bit of rain”. A little rain actually makes an interesting prairie organism come to life: star jelly (Nostoc commune). This organism looks like a tiny piece of crispy black poop when it’s dry but a greenish, gelatinous blob when wet. It’s actually a colonial cyanobacteria that lives on the prairies and adds much-needed nitrogen to the soil. I also saw a well disguised grasshopper blending in with the lichens and star jellies.

Star jellies, low to the grow in a field. Dark green, gelatinous blobs among the grass.

Star jellies (Nostoc commune) puff up and turn green when it rains.

A brown grasshopper blending in with the dried grass on the ground.

The colour pattern of this grasshopper helps it blend in with the vegetation.

The next day was my first day of pollinator surveys and though it wasn’t raining, it was so cool and windy that I saw virtually no insects. Luck was with me the next day though as I encountered perfect pollinator weather: warm, sunny, and with only a gentle breeze. Plus there were no ticks or mosquitoes! That rarely happens in Manitoba and was nice break from the last few years when I was constantly picking ticks off my pants. In addition, to seeing some nice big bumblebees, sweat bees, and a really cool beefly, there were several butterflies about as well. One of them was not so lucky as it got captured by a crab spider hiding on a groundsel (Senecio spp.) flower; a sad ending to a beautiful creature but spiders need to live too!

A butterfly capturing by a Yellow crab spider hiding on a yellow groundsel flower.

Yellow crab spiders blend in with the groundsel (Senecio sp.) flowers, making it easier for them to catch and eat pollinators like this butterfly.

A bumble bee on yellow leafy spurge.

Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) were visiting the invasive leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) plants at the preserve.

When I first started working at the Museum 12 years ago I decided to study plant-pollinator relationships in Tall-grass Prairie because it was an ecosystem that I had not visited before. Two years ago I switched to Fescue Prairie and now, to complete my understanding of prairie pollination, I need some data on Mixed Grass Prairie as well. My research will help us better understand how these prairies differ from each other and which plant species are most important for pollinators. I will be visiting Yellow Quill Prairie every two weeks until mid September and will keep you updated on the wonderful things that I see throughout the summer.

 

This research is made possible by funding from the Nature Conservancy of Canada and the Manitoba Museum Foundation.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson