Legacies of Confederation: Endangered Orchids

Legacies of Confederation: Endangered Orchids

When Manitoba became part of Canada in 1870 the stage was set for one of the largest land transformations in history. In the last 150 years nearly all of Manitoba’s wild prairies fell to the plough. The little patches that remain as ranch land, private nature preserves, and federal and provincial crown lands are home to a suite of increasingly rare organisms, among them two spectacular prairie orchids: Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara) and Small White Lady’s-slipper (Cypripedium candidum).  Models of these two species are on display in the Manitoba Museums’ Legacies of Confederation: A New Look at Manitoba History exhibit.

Close up on the top of a plant with fringed white flowers at the top of a tall stem.

Found only in moist, tall grass prairies with calcium-rich or alkaline soils, the Western Prairie Fringed Orchid is one of Canada’s legally protected endangered species. The only place where it is found in Canada is at the Tall Grass Prairie Preserve near Gardenton (click here for more details). Standing at almost a metre tall, this orchid produces an intoxicating fragrance to attract pollinating sphinx moths at night. The Canadian population is the largest in the world so its survival largely depends on our willingness to protect it.

 

Image: The endangered Western Prairie Fringed Orchid’s largest population is in Manitoba.

Close up on a plant with widely unfurling petals opening for a white ball-like centre mass.

Manitoba’s other endangered orchid, the Small White Lady’s-slipper, is a bit more widespread. It occurs at the Tall Grass Prairie Preserve but there are also populations further west, near Brandon, and further north, close to Lake Manitoba. It is a bit more common in the USA but still rare over most of its range. It prefers moist prairies with calcium-rich soils. The Small White Lady’s-slipper attracts small bees in the spring with its delicate scent but does not offer a nectar reward so pollination is infrequent.

 

Image: The Small White Lady’s-slipper is an endangered species in Manitoba and Canada.

In addition to their very specific habitat requirements these orchids produce seeds that are so tiny that there is virtually no nutrition available for young seedlings. In order to grow they need to form an association with a special fungus, called a mycorrhiza, which will help them get water and nutrients from the soil. The dependence of these two orchids on insect pollinators and soil fungus, along with the loss of habitat, has led to their endangerment.

It’s hard to believe that there was a time when people thought that species extinction was impossible. Humanity underestimated the power that our technology gave us over nature, and to some degree we still do. A conservation ethic did not really emerge until it was clear that there were no “lost worlds” left where rare species might still linger. The extinction of several Canadian bird species including the Labrador Duck (Camptorhynchus labradorius), Great Auk (Pinguinus impennis), Eskimo Curlew (Numenius borealis) and Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), largely due to overhunting, finally made Canadians understand our destructive capabilities and helped inspire the modern wildlife conservation movement. One of the benefits of confederation has been our collective will to ensure that some of Canada’s forests, tundra, prairies, lakes and ocean habitats are protected for all Canadians to benefit from–the 2-legged and the 4-legged and even the ones with no legs at all.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Everything you know about taste is wrong

Tasting is something we do everyday but many of the things we think we know about taste are actually wrong. So let the debunking begin!

Myth #1: You taste food with your tongue.

Fact: Your sense of taste involves your tongue AND your nose. When you are sick with a cold, food doesn’t taste very good. This is not because your taste buds aren’t working – it is because your nose isn’t working. To test this, close your eyes, plug your nose and pop a flavoured candy in your mouth. Can you tell which flavour it is? Then unplug your nose and see if you know. What you are experiencing when you unplug is retronasal olfaction (or smelling the back of the nose). Many flavours in food are released as gases while you chew, which then waft into your nose through the back of your mouth. In fact 80% to 90% of what we “taste” is actually detected by your nose.

Myth #2: There are four basic tastes.

A round, white Puffball mushroom growing among mostly dry grass.

Fact: There are actually at least five tastes: salty, sweet, sour, bitter, and umami. Umami (Japanese for “pleasant, savory taste”) is probably the term you are unfamiliar with. Umami is the rich, earthy taste you get from foods containing natural glutamate such as seaweed, fish sauce, meat, mushrooms, aged cheese, and even breast milk. Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is a common additive used to add umami taste to food. Although umami was discovered by a Japanese chemist in 1908, it wasn’t accepted as a fifth taste (it was thought to be a flavour enhancer) until 2009 when glutamate receptors were discovered on the human tongue.

 

Image: Mushrooms like this puffball (Lycoperdon spp.) have a distinct umami taste. © Manitoba Museum

Myth #3: The front of your tongue is where you taste sweet things and the back is where you taste bitter things.

A plant growing in a red-orange pot. The plant's branches reach out in all directions with oblong green leaves growing from them.

Fact: All five tastes can be detected all over your tongue. You may have seen a taste map of the tongue in a text book or on the internet. But it is wrong. The taste map was created in 1901 by a German scientist who simply asked volunteers to indicate where certain tastes were strongest; not very scientific at all. Since then, detailed studies using modern equipment have found receptors for all five tastes all over the tongue. However, there are slightly more receptors for certain tastes in certain areas; bitter tends to be detected most strongly, but not exclusively, at the back of the tongue.

 

Image: Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi), such as this one at the Montreal Botanic Garden, can have a bitter flavour that some people don’t like. © Manitoba Museum

Myth #4: Artificial flavour doesn’t taste right because it has too many chemicals in it.

A watercolour painting of a wild strawberry plant, showing the various stages of the plant's growth from blossom to fruit.

Fact: Artificial flavour doesn’t taste right because it has too FEW chemicals in it. I got into an argument once with another scientist over artificial strawberry flavour. I insisted that it didn’t taste quite right and he insisted that since it contains the exact same flavour chemicals as a real strawberry, it should taste exactly the same. Turns out we were both right. While artificial strawberry flavour does contain some of the chemicals that give a real strawberry its flavour, it doesn’t have all of them. Artificial flavour contains about 5 to 30 flavour and scent molecules but a real strawberry has over 300! The reason artificial flavour doesn’t have all those chemicals is because it would be too expensive to produce. So if you’ve never eaten a fresh strawberry right off the plant, artificial strawberry flavour might taste just fine to you. But to someone who grows strawberries in their backyard (that would be me) it doesn’t quite cut it. Plus it always reminds me of the taste of those fluoride treatments you get at the dentist!

 

Image: Nothing tastes as good as a real wild strawberry (Fragaria spp.). Painting by Norman Criddle. H9-23-415 © Manitoba Museum

Myth #5: Fruits are sweet and vegetables are bitter.

Fact: While it is true that many fruits contain sugar, some fruits are not sweet at all. Botanically speaking, a fruit is a structure that contains, or is attached to, one to many seeds-it has nothing to do with what it tastes like. Many things that we call vegetables are actually fruits including avocados, cucumbers, tomatoes, and squash. The taste of a fruit is influenced by the kind of animal that normally disperses it. Since some animals like juicy, bitter, sour, or fatty tastes, not all fruits are sweet.

Vegetables (defined as roots, tubers, bulbs, stems, and leaves) may be bitter due to the presence of toxins that discourage animals from eating them. However, humans have bred modern vegetables to be less bitter (and therefore less toxic). For example, wild carrot root is bitterer than modern varieties. Unfortunately, breeding out the bitter compounds (which are often natural pesticides) and increasing the sweet ones make our crop plants more desirable to insect pests.

Myth #6: Food tastes the same to everyone.

A coffee plant growing in a botanical garden, tall and covered in green leaves.

Fact: Everyone has a different number of taste buds; the number that you have controls the volume of your food. People with lots of taste buds (super-tasters) tend to dislike really bitter and spicy foods (because they taste louder) while people with fewer taste buds (non-tasters) may find them pleasant or stimulating. Black coffee and dark chocolate are two foods that non-tasters usually like and super-tasters dislike. Bitter vegetables like kale may also be disliked by super-tasters. This may explain, at least partly, why some people are picky eaters, although cultural factors are also extremely important. So the saying “everyman to his taste” is most certainly true.

 

Image: Black coffee (Coffea spp.) is usually loved by non-tasters and disguised with cream and sugar by supertasters. Photo taken at the Montreal Botanical Garden. © Manitoba Museum

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Drinking Christmas (trees, that is)

At the Museum’s recent Surviving the Apocalypse Night participants were asked a variety of questions about the nutritional value of certain foods. Sadly, very few people knew that you can make a beverage high in vitamin C from…Christmas trees!

The Indigenous peoples of North America have long known of the health-giving properties of some cone-bearing (also called evergreen) trees. In Canada, First Nations peoples drank an herbal tea of evergreen needles to ward off scurvy, usually in winter when fresh fruits and vegetables were hard to come by. This simple remedy was not known by early British and French explorers, who often succumbed to this disease. Scurvy causes weakness, gum disease, impairs healing, and eventually leads to fever, convulsion, and death. Symptoms set in after about a month of low to no vitamin C intake. The explorer Jacques Cartier was told about a scurvy remedy by the Indigenous people he encountered in eastern Canada, who felt pity for the suffering Europeans (see more here). Cartier was so impressed at the ability of the tea to cure scurvy that he called the tree species an “arbre de vie” or “tree of life”.

Close up on a fir tree branch full of green needles.

In addition to being a popular Christmas tree, fir (Abies spp.) needles can be used to make a beverage high in vitamin C. ©Manitoba Museum

Close up on a cedar tree branch.

The plant used to make Cartier’s tea may have been a cedar (Thuja spp.). ©Manitoba Museum

Close up on a green Tamarack branch.

Evergreen needle tea is also high in vitamin A-which you need to prevent blindness-folic acid and minerals. The tea can be brewed by collecting the youngest needles on a tree (the ones right at the tip), coarsely chopping them, pouring boiling water over them and steeping for a few minutes. About a tablespoon of needles to a cup of water is about the right proportion. Although spruces (Picea spp.) are the most common trees used to make herbal teas, other cone-bearing trees including pine (Pinus spp.), fir (Abies spp.), cedar (Thuja spp.) and larch (Larix spp.) can also be used. I prefer to have it in a blend with some dried mint to add extra flavour.

 

Image: Although it bears cones tamarack (Larix laricina) is not an evergreen; it loses its needles in the fall. ©Manitoba Museum

On the east coast, European settlers began making an alcoholic version of this beverage by adding spruce needles to molasses (from the Caribbean) and yeast to make spruce beer. By 1738, George Spence, the Hudson’s Bay Company surgeon in Fort Albany, Ontario, reported making and providing spruce beer to HBC employees as an anti-scorbutic (click here to learn more). This knowledge was eventually passed on to the British Military by Sir Joseph Banks, who encountered the beverage when he was botanizing in Newfoundland and Labrador in 1766. Captain James Cook brought casks of this beer on board his ships in the late 1700’s (along with various other foods, such as citrus fruits) and did not lose a single man to scurvy!   If you’re so inclined, you can click here for a recipe for spruce beer.

Close up on the red, fleshy cone of a yew tree.

Warnings

Evergreen teas should be drunk in moderation (a cup of weak tea a day is probably fine) as large amounts are reported to be toxic. Pregnant women should NOT drink evergreen tea as it may cause a miscarriage. Yew (Taxus spp.) trees are really poisonous so make sure you can tell a yew apart from the other cone-bearing trees. Yews have flat needles with pointed tips and fleshy red fruits with a single seed in the middle instead of dry cones. They are not common in Manitoba and are shrubs usually less than 2 metres tall.

 

Image: The toxic yew (Taxus spp.) trees have fleshy red cones, not dry ones. By Rob Routledge, Sault College, Bugwood.org [CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.

Below is a simple identification key to Manitoba’s wild cone-bearing trees. To use it, select the statement (a or b) that best describes the plant. Continue selecting statements until you come to the name of a species. Then double check the identity by consulting a field guide or reputable website. Please note that there are some exotic cone-bearing trees planted in urban areas, which may not be in this key.

1a. Trees with scale-like, overlapping leavesEastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis)
1b. Trees with needle-like leavesSee 2
2a. Leaves in clusters of 2 to manySee 3
2b. Leaves borne singlySee 4
3a. Leaves in clusters of 10-40, deciduous; base of clusters without a sheathTamarack (Larix laricina)
3b. Leaves in clusters of 2-5, evergreen; base of clusters enclosed in a sheathPine (Pinus spp.)
4a. Leaves 4-sided, not appearing 2-ranked, borne on short woody pegsSpruce (Picea spp.)
4b. Leaves flat, appearing 2-ranked, not borne on woody pegsSee 5
5a. Leaves rounded or notched at the tip; bearing dry cones; bark grey and smooth or scalyBalsam fir (Abies balsamea)
5b. Leaves pointed at the tip; bearing reddish fleshy fruits with a single seed in the middle; bark reddish and shreddyCanada yew (Taxus canadensis)
Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Death caps, stinkhorns and honey mushrooms

A line of capped mushrooms at progressive states of development.

Late fall is when a number of interesting Canadian fungi produce mushrooms. Some are edible, some are smelly, and some are deadly. It was with great sadness that I read of the recent death of a 3-year old Canadian boy who ate a poisonous mushroom (click here for CBC article). It appears that he ate the most deadly species in the Amanita genus: the Death Cap (Amanita phalloides), shown in the photo to the right in various stages of development (image from Wikimedia Commons). His unfortunate demise serves as a warning to anyone who is interested in foraging for wild mushrooms: be absolutely, 100% certain of the identity of any wild mushroom before you eat it. For starters, this means investing in some good mushroom field guides and books, and familiarizing yourself with the parts of mushrooms (e.g. cap, gills, veil etc.). Then you need to learn to identify not just the edible mushrooms in your area, but also the deadly ones they could be confused with. When foraging, carefully examine and cut through every mushroom, dig up the base, cut the gills to see if any latex leaks out, and make a spore print (a process that can take a few hours). The North American Mycological Association has good instructions on how to make spore prints (click here for details), and lists some good books.

The fact of the matter is there are no reliable “rules of thumb” when it comes to identifying edible mushrooms. Many people mistakenly think that poisonous mushrooms are brightly coloured like the Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) but many Amanitas are white, creamy, or brownish. A veil on the stem and scales on the cap, other characters used to identify Amanitas, are not always present. Some mushrooms are edible only when they are young and cooked. However, cooking does NOT destroy all of the toxins in Amanitas. People may assume that poisonous mushrooms will taste bad, but the last words of a man who died of Amanita poisoning were reportedly “that was the tastiest mushroom I ever ate”. And you can’t trust squirrels either; they can reportedly eat Amanitas without dying. The fact is, to the untrained, it is easy to confuse an Amanita with a number of edible species such as Button Mushrooms (Agaricus silvicola), certain Milkcaps (such as Lactarius volemus), or Puffballs (Lycoperdon) especially when they are young.

Two bright red-capped mushrooms, one in the ground, and one plucked and laying beside it.

The poisonous Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) is brightly coloured but not all poisonous mushrooms are. From Wikimedia Commons.

A cluster of white, bulbous mushrooms growing low to the ground.

Young Amanita mushrooms may be confused with edible puffballs (Lycoperdon). Cutting through the center can help you differentiate one from the other.

A mushroom with a ridged, brown cap and a light-coloured stem lying on green moss.

Amanitas are not the only poisonous mushrooms in North America (although none are as deadly as them). Other potentially poisonous genera include: Clitocybe, Collybia, Galerina , Gyromitra, Inocybe, and some Russula and Lactarius species to name a few (see more here). Consuming alcohol with certain normally edible mushrooms (such as Coprinus) can also cause illness. Recent immigrants to Canada should be especially cautious when foraging as species that are poisonous here may look similar to edible species in their homeland. For example, the paddy straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) looks very similar to death caps, but the former species has pink spores while the latter has white ones. Paddy straw mushrooms are common in southeast Asia but are NOT found in Canada. Making things more complicated, there are a number of Amanita species that grow on other continents (including Africa and Europe) that are edible and could be confused with the poisonous North American ones.

 

Image: The poisonous False Morel (Gyromitra esculenta) has been mistaken for edible Morels (Morchella spp.)

One of the most common edible and prized mushrooms growing right now is the Honey Mushroom (Armillaria mellae). This species is actually a parasite on trees and is often found at the base of tree stumps. However, the similar Shaggy Scalycap (Pholiota squarrosa) grows in the same habitat but is poisonous, more so when consumed with alcohol (although usually not fatally) so pickers beware!

A cardboard tray full of picked Honey Mushrooms.

Honey Mushrooms (Armillaria mellae) are among the most popular edible fungi in the province. But beware the impostor…

A Shaggy Scalycap mushroom, picked and against a black background.

…Shaggy Scalycap (Pholiota squarrosa) which looks similar but is poisonous!

Two phallic shaped mushrooms with thick cream-coloured stems and dark hooded tips lying on a white surface.

Another interesting inedible species growing right now is the extremely smelly stinkhorn (Phallus impudicus) fungus. A Museum volunteer recently brought me some specimens of this species and it really stunk up the room. Many of my colleagues thought it smelled tasty but I found the slight undercurrent of rotting flesh to be a bit overwhelming.

Mushroom hunting can be a fun and rewarding activity, not to mention tasty. Some people even make their livelihood from collecting certain wild mushrooms, like Morels (Morchella). But it is not an endeavor that should be taken lightly, as a mistake can cost you your life. The only way to safely collect mushrooms is to know how to identify them. Be smart and be safe!

 

Image: These stinkhorn fungi (Phallus impudicus) really stunk up my lab!

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Pollination: A Comparison of Prairies

It was with some sadness that I finished my last field work of the season at the Nature Conservancy’s Yellow Quill Prairie. It will be many long, cold months before I get to go out again. However, I was eager to get back to the office to crunch some numbers and see how the pollinator community in mixed grass prairie differed from the fescue and tall grass prairies that I’ve studied previously.

View over a prairie landscape, with a dark tree line in the distance.

The little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) had turned a lovely reddish purple by September.

Two pinkish flowers, gone to seed, growing among tall grass.

The three-flowered avens (Geum triflorum) were mostly in seed by the time I started my surveys.

The most commonly visited plant in the mixed grass prairie was wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa), receiving just over a quarter of all observed visits, mainly from bees and butterflies. This species received only 3.6% of all visits in fescue prairie and less than 1% in the tall grass prairie. You may be familiar with this species because it is often available for sale at greenhouses.

Showy goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis) was an interesting species because it is one of the top visited plants in all three prairie types. This suggests that it would be a particularly useful plant for prairie reclamation because of its widespread distribution and popularity with a wide number of pollinators.

Close-up on a frilly, purple flower.

Wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa) was the most commonly visited flower, here being visited by a bee fly (Anastoechus sp.)

Cluster of yellow flowers at the top of a Showy goldenrod plant.

Showy goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis) was a popular plant in mixed, fescue and tall grass prairie.

A bumblebee in the centre of a yellow sunflower.

In terms of the pollinating insect community, mixed grass prairie was more similar to fescue than tall grass prairie. Bees and wasps were the dominant pollinators in mixed grass and fescue prairie whereas flies dominated in tall grass prairie, likely due to differences in moisture. Another difference was that butterflies and moths were more common pollinators in the mixed grass prairie, performing about 10% of all visits compared to 4.3% and 0.9% in fescue and tall grass prairie respectively.

The most common pollinators were bumblebees (Bombus sp.); they made almost half of all visits in the mixed grass prairie. In contrast, bumblebees were slightly more active in fescue prairie making 60% of all visits and slightly less common in tall grass prairie making 25%.

 

Image: Bumblebee (Bombus sp.) visiting a sunflower (Helianthus sp.)

Until next year I’ll be enjoying looking at my photographs, and remembering the smells and sounds of the prairie.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

The mystery of the moving cow pie

Usually cow pies are extremely uninteresting features of a prairie landscape (and one to usually avoid) but this month something funny was happening with them at the Nature Conservancy’s Yellow Quill Prairie that made me look twice. For starters, one day I saw a cow pie moving.

As it turns out though, it wasn’t really the cow pie that was moving: it was a toad, a Canadian Toad (Anaxyrus hemiophrys) to be specific. As I stepped next to a cow pie in one of my research plots, the aforementioned toad made a short hop. It took me a few seconds to actually find the toad as it blended in with the cow pies and dried grass quite magnificently. I had never really appreciated how well the colour of these creatures helps them to blend in with their surroundings. The toad looked hot and, as I was leaving for the day and no longer needed the water in my bottle, I decided to give him a shower. To my surprise he made a happy chirping sound and wiggled his back. Good deed for the day completed!

A dried cow pie on the ground with a toad blending in next to it.

I thought the cow pie was moving when this little toad hopped away!

Close up on the back of a Canadian Toad.

This Canadian Toad (Anaxyrus hemiophrys) really appreciated the shower I gave it.

A drying cow pie with small, light brown mushrooms growing out of it.

The other interesting thing happening to the cow pies was that they were becoming fungal gardens. We rarely appreciate the fact that the soil beneath our feet is just as (actually, probably much more) biologically diverse as the world above ground. Prairie soils are loaded with all kinds of insects, bacteria, nematodes, and fungi living in and around the prolific plant roots, some of which go down five meters! So the part of the prairie plants that you actually see is only their “head”; the rest of their “body” is underground.

Fungi live most of their lives as hyphae which are the fungal equivalent of “roots” so during dry years, you won’t even know that they exist. But when it gets wet (like it did the day I started my field work), the reproductive stage of the fungi is triggered and they begin producing mushrooms. The wet weather this year combined with the high nutrient cow pies resulted in a prolific “mushrooming” of the prairie. On one cow pie I saw a species that we have almost no specimens of in our collection: a Bird’s Nest Fungus (Cyathus sp.). There was no way around it; to get a specimen of this fungus I would have to pry the tiny cups out with my hands. Would I stick my fingers in feces for science? As it turns out the answer is YES! Fortunately, I always bring hand sanitizer and gloves with me.

 

Image: All the cowpies at Yellow Quill Prairie were covered with mushrooms this July.

Small bird's nest or shell-shaped mushrooms growing on the top of a drying cow pie.

This little Bird’s Nest Fungi (Cyathus sp.) will make a great addition to the Manitoba Museum’s fungal collection.

A cluster of smooth, brown capped mushrooms growing in a dry cow pie.

The warm wet weather provided the perfect growing conditions for coprophilous fungi like this one.

The Yellow Quill Prairie is currently being sustainably grazed by cattle, which is why the cow pies are even there. Doing so increases the fungal diversity of the prairie as some species are strictly coprophilous (e.g. poop-loving) and would not otherwise be there. Although these fungi would have initially evolved to decompose Bison pies, cow pies are not much different from them, and therefore cattle fill a similar ecological role.

As the prairie dried out the mushrooms, having completed their spore-dispersal goal, began to wither away in the heat of the day. But I won’t forget the brief glimpse that I got of the diversity that lay beneath my feet.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Water-lilies and Wetlands

Close up on several low-growing pitcher plants, one of which is consuming a fly.

Wetland plants are the least commonly collected and photographed plants in Manitoba for good reasons. For starters they’re protected by the most vicious gangs of thugs you can imagine: bloodthirsty mosquitoes and black flies. I’ve taken many blurry photographs in my day because I was too busy swatting mosquitoes to focus properly. No matter how good the bug jacket is, the pests always seem to find a way in. Wetland work can be utterly exhausting: walking in a bog is like taking a stair climbing class taught by Satan! I got heatstroke from doing bog work once. Further, unless you’ve got a magical inflatable boat that shrinks to the size of a wallet, collecting wetland plants often means one thing: getting wet and muddy, and, if you’re in a bog, potentially sinking to your doom!

 

Image: Mosquito-eating Pitcherplants (Sarracenia purpurea) and Sundews (Drosera spp.) are a welcome sight (note the fly in the lower pitcher).

There are only two occasions where I thoroughly enjoyed botanizing in wetlands. One was during my field work to find a new species of water-lily (Lori’s Water-lily or Nymphaea loriana) in northern Manitoba. Manitoba Hydro offered to fly my companion John Wiersema and I up to Jenpeg, and to have a few locals take us out on a motorboat to look for it. The great thing about being on a boat is that it is windy enough on the open water to keep the bugs down. On that trip we collected plant specimens for DNA analysis which eventually led to my recent publication in the Canadian Field Naturalist (Read more here).

The other day of enjoyable wetland botanizing happened just last month at the brand new Brokenhead Wetland Interpretive Trail (Find more details here). This gorgeous 1.83 km trail (less than an hour north of the city) runs parallel to the Brokenhead Wetlands Ecological Reserve. If you’ve ever wanted to see rare orchids or carnivorous plants, this is the best way to do it. Almost the entire trail is boardwalk so your feet never get wet and you don’t have to worry about sinking and turning into a bog mummy!

View out across a wetland from on the water. On the banks grow greenery and trees.

Boreal wetlands are best visited by boat.

View down a wooden boardwalk flanked by wetland greenery and water, with trees growing further to the side.

The boardwalk through the fen at the Brokenhead Wetlands Interpretive Trail.

The trail first passes through a fragrant white cedar (Thuja occidentalis) swamp before reaching the more open fen habitat. I was easily able to see four species of carnivorous plants: pitcherplants (Sarracenia purpurea), round-leaved and oblong-leaved sundews (Drosera rotundifolia and D. anglica), and common bladderwort (Utricularia vulgaris). Although it was lovely to see Dragon’s-mouth orchid (Arethusa bulbosa), grass-pink (Calopogon tuberosus), spotted coralroot (Corallorrhiza maculata), and several species of bog-orchids (Platanthera spp.), the bell of the ball was definitely the spectacular showy lady’s-slipper (Cypripedium reginae). One was growing right next to the trail facilitating a perfect photograph!

Close up on a Showy Lady's-slipper flower - a flower with three white upper petals and a larger, pinkish, cup-like lower petal.

This Showy Lady’s-slipper (Cypripedium reginae) was growing right next to the trail.

Close-up on Grass Pink orchid, a small pink-purple flower with triangular-shaped leaves.

The lovely Grass Pink orchid (Calopogon tuberosus).

I love how the trail was interpreted with a First Nations perspective that included information about traditional Ojibway uses of local plants. It was lovely to be able to visit a wetland where I could appreciate the plants up close. This trail is a must see for nature lovers as it lets you experience a world that you may never see.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Gettin’ down at Yellow Quill Prairie

View out over the prairie landscape, with a light fence and sign in the lower right foreground.

Last week I started my field season by getting down on my hands and knees to collect plants and pollinators at the Yellow Quill Prairie Preserve, which is owned and managed by the Nature Conservancy of Canada. While that may not sound particularly appealing to you, it is something that I love about my job. After a long winter stuck inside, it is marvelous to spend some time out in nature appreciating the absence of city noise. When I arrived at the prairie, I was greeted by a sound that I absolutely adore: the call of a Western Meadowlark (hear it in this video). Nothing says “prairie” like a meadowlark!

 

Image: It was cool and rainy when I got to the Nature Conservancy’s Yellow Quill Prairie Preserve.

Unfortunately I was also greeted by something not so pleasant: rain and wind. Those two things in combination result in the dreaded sideways rain; you know the rain that hits you right in the face rather than landing on your hat. “Oh well,” I thought, “all I have to do on the first day is select my plots and I can do that in a bit of rain”. A little rain actually makes an interesting prairie organism come to life: star jelly (Nostoc commune). This organism looks like a tiny piece of crispy black poop when it’s dry but a greenish, gelatinous blob when wet. It’s actually a colonial cyanobacteria that lives on the prairies and adds much-needed nitrogen to the soil. I also saw a well disguised grasshopper blending in with the lichens and star jellies.

Star jellies, low to the grow in a field. Dark green, gelatinous blobs among the grass.

Star jellies (Nostoc commune) puff up and turn green when it rains.

A brown grasshopper blending in with the dried grass on the ground.

The colour pattern of this grasshopper helps it blend in with the vegetation.

The next day was my first day of pollinator surveys and though it wasn’t raining, it was so cool and windy that I saw virtually no insects. Luck was with me the next day though as I encountered perfect pollinator weather: warm, sunny, and with only a gentle breeze. Plus there were no ticks or mosquitoes! That rarely happens in Manitoba and was nice break from the last few years when I was constantly picking ticks off my pants. In addition, to seeing some nice big bumblebees, sweat bees, and a really cool beefly, there were several butterflies about as well. One of them was not so lucky as it got captured by a crab spider hiding on a groundsel (Senecio spp.) flower; a sad ending to a beautiful creature but spiders need to live too!

A butterfly capturing by a Yellow crab spider hiding on a yellow groundsel flower.

Yellow crab spiders blend in with the groundsel (Senecio sp.) flowers, making it easier for them to catch and eat pollinators like this butterfly.

A bumble bee on yellow leafy spurge.

Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) were visiting the invasive leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) plants at the preserve.

When I first started working at the Museum 12 years ago I decided to study plant-pollinator relationships in Tall-grass Prairie because it was an ecosystem that I had not visited before. Two years ago I switched to Fescue Prairie and now, to complete my understanding of prairie pollination, I need some data on Mixed Grass Prairie as well. My research will help us better understand how these prairies differ from each other and which plant species are most important for pollinators. I will be visiting Yellow Quill Prairie every two weeks until mid September and will keep you updated on the wonderful things that I see throughout the summer.

 

This research is made possible by funding from the Nature Conservancy of Canada and the Manitoba Museum Foundation.

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Canada’s Sexiest Plants and Fungi

Compared to colourful birds with elaborate mating rituals and studly male mammals fighting over whom gets to mate with a harem of females, the sex lives of plants and fungi seem downright boring. To counter this perception I am pleased to bring to you my list of Canada’s sexiest plants.

A pine cone on a tree branch with a blue sky in the background..

Sexiest Name:

Rigid Pine (Pinus rigida)

To understand why Rigid Pine has a sexy name you need to know a few things about how to pronounce its Latin name: Pinus rigida. Technically the correct pronunciation of Pinus  in Latin is PEE-nus, which sounds a heck of a lot like, um, well you know. Saying the correctly pronounced genus name (as many European scientists do) with the species epithet of “rigida” afterwards is enough to get an entire crowd of botanists at a conference tittering like schoolgirls. This is why Canadian scientists prefer to pronounce it incorrectly as PIE-nus. Ah Rigid Pine, your mere name evokes sexual images in us all!

 

Image: A hard, erect cone of Rigid Pine. From Wikimedia Commons

Close up on the top of a plant with fringed white flowers at the top of a tall stem.

Sexiest plant-pollinator relationship:

Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara)

This plant, with its tall flowering stalks and strong fragrance is not trying to attract humans, although it certainly achieves that goal. Instead the object of its affection is the Cherry Sphinx Moth. On moonlit nights the moths, attracted to the intoxicating fragrance of the orchid, hover in front of the delicate petals, slowly unfurl their coiled tongues then gently insert them deep into the spur of the orchid to reach the sweet, sweet nectar that lies within. Whew! Is it just me or did it suddenly get hot in here?

 

Image: The fragrant, sexy flowers of this orchid attract graceful moths for a moonlight rendezvous.  The Manitoba Museum.

Close up on two white water lily flowers among a cluster of green lily pads on the water's surface.

Sexiest fragrance:

Fragrant Water-lily (Nymphaea odorata)

This captivating water-lily is so popular that humans regularly grow it in backyard ponds to appreciate its gorgeous perfume. The alluring fragrance captivates more than humans: insects like beetles and bumblebees brave long journeys over water where they could easily drown to partake of the rich succulent pollen that is being offered by the plant. The scientific name alludes to the captivating beauty of these plants, referring to the water nymphs described in Greek and Roman mythology.

 

Image: Popular for their sexy fragrance, humans like to grow these water-lilies in ponds. The Manitoba Museum

A phallic shaped mushroom with a thick cream-coloured stem and dark hooded tip growing from a bulbous brown base on a ground covered with dead leaves.

Sexiest fungus:

Stinkhorn (Phallus spp.)

My first impression of the discipline of mycology was that it was the least sexy subject you could take in biology, fungi being the main organisms involved in decay. Stinkhorns however, completely changed my mind. Stinkhorns are smelly fungi that look very similar to a certain organ on a man’s body, consisting of a round cup-like base, a long shaft and a cap at the end with a little hole at the tip that emits spores. The scientist that named this genus, Carolus Linneaus, rather boldly named it Phallus. The most common species in Canada is Phallus impudicus, which roughly translates to “shameless erect penis fungus”. I’ll never forget the first time I encountered a species of Phallus  in the wild. I was really excited to finally see one of them in the “flesh” but, I have to admit I was disappointed that it was so small.

 

Image: Stinkhorns are a fungus that looks like a small, you know what. From Wikimedia Commons

An orchid with its lower sac-like petal coloured black and yellow in a very similar manner to a bee's stripes.

Sexiest international plant:

Bee orchids (Ophrys spp.)

The sexiest plants outside of Canada have to be the European Bee Orchids. These orchids are so sexy that males of a completely different species want to have sex with them! The orchid flowers look and smell like females bees. Eager young male bees land on these little orchids and try to copulate with them. As they do this, the pollen sacs (pollinia) of the orchid rub off onto to the heads (or sometimes the bums) of the bees. The next orchid those amorous bees visit will receive the pollen sacs and be fertilized.

 

Image: Bee orchids are so sexy that bees want to mate with it! From Wikimedia Commons

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson

Seeds of Days Past

Recently I became aware of a hundred year old collection of seeds located not in the Botany collection at the Museum but in the History collection. What were 100 years old seeds doing in the history lab? It turns out that they were donated in 1991 along with many other artifacts and specimens from the famous Criddle family (learn more about the Criddles, here) but not thoroughly catalogued.

Questions about proper seed preservation recently came up and our History Cataloguer asked me about them, assuming that I knew this collection existed, which I didn’t. I looked closely at the five boxes of tiny vials of wildflower and weed seeds from Manitoba and was absolutely thrilled. The Criddles were amateur naturalists who collected scientific specimens of seeds, mammals, and insects and recorded meticulous weather data in the late 1880’s to early 1900’s. I immediately realized that some of the seeds were of species that have become rare due to the stabilization of the Carberry sand dunes. These seeds are some of the first specimens of these rare plants to ever be collected in Manitoba and will be important for their status assessment.

A shallow box filled with four rows of small vials of seeds, each carefully labelled.

Image: Seed collections are valuable references for identifying unknown seeds. TMM H9-23-142.

An outdoor plaque sharing some of the history of Norman Criddle in both English and French.

Plaque about Norman Criddle at the Criddle-Vane National Historic site.

In recent years, seed preservation has become increasingly important because of concerns about the loss of genetic diversity in crop seeds, as well as the loss of species in the wild. In fact you may have heard of the so-called “Doomsday Vault” located in an underground bunker in Svalbard (learn more here). They protect the most diverse collection of crop seeds in the world in case natural (or human-caused) disasters eliminate the plants in their agricultural settings.

Here at the Museum we don’t have such a dramatic seed collection as we simply don’t have the high-tech cold storage space to permanently house and protect wild plant seeds. The main purpose of our collection is to act as a reference for identifying unknown species of seeds. Our seed collection has been used to identify the gut contents of dead animals (read blog “CSI Manitoba: The Case of the Broken Beak” here), and preserved seeds dug up in ancient archaeological sites among other things.

So why did it take so long for me to discover this collection? The Museum usually receives more donations of artifacts and specimens than we can process in any given year. When the staff is busy with projects such as new gallery exhibits, a backlog of specimens builds up. This seed collection, having received a bit of care when it first came in, could simply not be thoroughly catalogued until recently. I wonder what other interesting things are in the Museum’s backlog waiting to be rediscovered?

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Dr. Diana Bizecki Robson

Curator of Botany

Dr. Bizecki Robson obtained a Master’s Degree in Plant Ecology at the University of Saskatchewan studying rare plants of the mixed grass prairies. After working as an environmental consultant and sessional lecturer…
Meet Dr. Bizecki Robson